From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing? Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:02:00 +0900 Message-ID: <874nlo567r.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <508179DB.20602@alice.it> <50820FAA.8050107@cornell.edu> <50821134.7080609@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350824534 31763 80.91.229.3 (21 Oct 2012 13:02:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daniel Colascione , emacs , Ken Brown , Angelo Graziosi To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 21 15:02:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TPvAa-0004nP-Id for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:02:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49758 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPvAS-0000dI-Vy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:02:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59701) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPvAP-0000YO-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPvAP-0003Tk-1P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:02:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:53319) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPvAO-0003TP-Nq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:02:08 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE089708E0; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:02:00 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 788F21A321E; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:02:00 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta32) "habanero" b0d40183ac79 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154469 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > I don't think Emacs should check for every third party packaging bug. Anybody who actually runs configure is a relatively high-probability potential code contributor. This is a rather cheap way to convince such people that Emacs cares about them and their platform.