From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12144: 24.1; (elisp) `Initial Parameters' misleading about minibuffer-only Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0800 Message-ID: <874nl4qfyk.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352125933 7832 80.91.229.3 (5 Nov 2012 14:32:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12144@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 05 15:32:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TVNiu-0003BH-DS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:32:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55027 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVNil-00025H-Jr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:32:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVNib-000247-Qu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVNiX-0004rT-FF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:32:01 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39755) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVNiX-0004rO-Bv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:31:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVNlW-0002XS-Gw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12144 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12144-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12144.13521260709707 (code B ref 12144); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12144) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2012 14:34:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50003 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVNkz-0002WV-Ur for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:34:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:52945) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVNkw-0002WM-Mb for 12144@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:34:27 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id ro8so3969936pbb.3 for <12144@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 06:31:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=hNPqrtwN3A4E2lI+5bAolieQzWKiSB2vYq/p6Pk9Z54=; b=sg98p0EgHz49NsUZ8I3lmxQ1w1huE9I1aaH0PiKPlEapxxrSl2JV5C6eB0PUSjvgYO 0LsrBFYbNdoIJruTF40lYHP1h4L5QSKP4LiPMWguBT7lBO0VBxr49G+p++91YrbYkVDH XawQEVqSWj89hhJt+wf+0lmcvPhfOApI5SJZw1XdVW3JiYTfPzTksnhsW0+krSuNaHVC oaGnGIfU5JpJGZ8k4VyOPMudsUYUxTNVGQ7XrzS8EGF1ZUKpTKcsqVX4vXi+8Sg7vtVx z4WFAZhtNUg9iG8zS38DzG81hBzgMSNCUuClPjeUthc6PIyZIuTNJMspHPsanasO86W8 psIA== Original-Received: by 10.68.239.104 with SMTP id vr8mr30841065pbc.59.1352125880481; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 06:31:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ulysses (cm198.gamma83.maxonline.com.sg. [202.156.83.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ve6sm10643457pbc.58.2012.11.05.06.31.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 06:31:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 5 Aug 2012 16:06:23 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66476 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > In this node, the text tries to say that if `initial-frame-alist' > contains (minbuffer), i.e., (minibuffer . nil) then that means that you > also want to create another, minibuffer-only frame, which has the > parameter value (minbuffer . only). And so Emacs creates that > standalone minibuffer frame for you automatically. > > The existing text that tries to say this is highly misleading. It > actually suggests that (minibuffer . nil) specifies a separate > minibuffer-only frame, whereas it is (minibuffer . only) that specifies > that. Fixed, thanks.