From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 11:22:53 -0600 Message-ID: <874n5lyo7m.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com> References: <20140102095347.6834E381D0C@snark.thyrsus.com> <87fvp6bdd9.fsf_-_@ktab.red-bean.com> <83wqiixqbb.fsf@gnu.org> <83ob3uxfr2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wqihdxsw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83y52xw4bh.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388769792 4232 80.91.229.3 (3 Jan 2014 17:23:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bastien , lekktu@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 03 18:23:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz8Sm-00032u-V0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 18:23:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50930 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz8Sm-0001iL-CQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 12:23:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz8Se-0001hg-OV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 12:23:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz8SW-0004bz-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 12:23:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]:59661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz8SW-0004b4-Os; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 12:22:56 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id at1so16177869iec.19 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 09:22:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=6T3/avfX5ALFTED0qUYMa7ZDSlSo7uaIcGDwTTX5r6Y=; b=Zt4B/UMRd1JwlXJkbKPF3nCdg5KEWgbZV/+XZeXThCrSM5srUFKafxHSXTd0XLKM6k AdQCPbsGSMld2BnbzXOuzltubi9JkW6HwFcGZv2SdraDSRMwqvLWC/qmBVdDL8faPzgG S4G98nIQz4PDmRhuv5AiK7jYWbn+fnAOVpzn8jsNMCjWPn1MVLH8gaCoRluS666RcbtG pa0o5owZqk6D7Aj33SZE3xBDRIVlUgM4uhHxJSl1B5hJgQoPSV/NasMSv1VAhtmApHYT ervEmGaaqZ521tZxC+acBETsbDhM/2OSxcGLGaRu69nou8eCwN95FQGdQhT5Z+lOFGQ/ lSeA== X-Received: by 10.50.43.233 with SMTP id z9mr4058846igl.33.1388769775617; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 09:22:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ktab.red-bean.com (74-92-190-113-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [74.92.190.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u1sm2705769ige.1.2014.01.03.09.22.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Jan 2014 09:22:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83y52xw4bh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:03:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167190 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >I didn't feel it was that way. Karl asked for opinions and I provided >mine. I hope no one, including Karl, expected to hear only the YES >kind of responses. I didn't ask anyone to please me, and didn't say I >will stop working on Emacs if it did switch. Eli's response was exactly the kind of information I was hoping to elicit, yes. I also agree that a vote from someone like Eli should somehow count more than a vote from (say) me. But even adjusting for that, the total vote weight in favor of switching to git is still pretty clear in this thread, as others have noted. >I don't see the need. Either we switch to git or we don't, it's that >simple. No one will switch to anything else. That does seem right.