From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6159: 23.2; c++ parenthesis matching problem Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:42:49 -0800 Message-ID: <874n4f3gqu.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <20100511165758.GA3210@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391471124 4596 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2014 23:45:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 23:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6159@debbugs.gnu.org, Ertan Dogrultan To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 04 00:45:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WATCi-0002wT-VM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:45:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50077 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATCi-0002b7-I9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:45:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38029) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATCX-0002an-MQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:45:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATCS-0007xB-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:45:17 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATCJ-0007bp-G6; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WATCJ-0002lo-1m; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:45:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6159 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 6159-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6159.139147104810552 (code B ref 6159); Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2014 23:44:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WATBQ-0002k7-9V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:39302) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WATBM-0002jx-Gi for 6159@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:44:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WATB6-0001Nn-Qe; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:43:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20100511165758.GA3210@muc.de> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Tue, 11 May 2010 16:57:58 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WATB6-0001Nn-Qe MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392075829.7307@S5/xXHrF0xWsGSBCgKscCg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84519 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:58:00AM -0700, Ertan Dogrultan wrote: >> I do C++ programming on Emacs. When I call methods of a class from an >> object pointer and write like object->get_value(); The sign '>' is >> considered like parenthesis and causes indentation mistakes, although >> the program compiles and executes without any problems. > > this is a known problem with C++. It takes semantic analysis (i.e. a > compiler) reliably to distinguish between "greater than" and "close > template". However, there are improvements to this being worked on. > > Is there any chance you could supply a preferably small but complete > piece of source code which illustrates the problem? Does the bug happen > with every -> operator, or only in certain circumstances? More information was requested three years ago, but no further progress has been made, so I'm closing this bug report. If this problem is still present, please reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/