From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10956: make-mode.el - improve makefile-warn-suspicious-lines Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:51:33 -0800 Message-ID: <874n4dysfe.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <62ehq5qt.fsf@test20.cante.net> <20120321185242.GE28863@taiko.cante.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391647992 32398 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2014 00:53:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 00:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10956@debbugs.gnu.org, jaalto To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 06 01:53:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDDP-0004eJ-MP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:53:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33949 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDDP-00032h-8u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:53:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDDI-00032Q-80 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:53:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDDC-0001Cp-Tj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDDC-0001Cl-Qf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDDC-00073j-8f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10956 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 10956-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10956.139164797527107 (code B ref 10956); Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 00:52:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51592 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDD4-000739-Uy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:52:55 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55329) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDD3-000731-4T for 10956@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:52:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDCn-0007wl-5c; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:52:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:36:48 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WBDCn-0007wl-5c MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392252758.27859@gATPlGbZ9jMqznkyXvGe6g X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84669 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I notice the absence of a line with only spaces in your examples. > Would you consider such a line as suspicious? > Could you expand on why you consider your examples as suspicious? > I think I'd agree with "\t[ \t]*" since such lines behave identically to > TAB-only lines, but I'm not so sure about lines starting with a space. > > Since such suspicious lines end up prompting the user, we had better be > sure they're really risky, otherwise we might bother people for no > good reason. More information was requested a year ago, but no further progress seems to have been made. I'm closing this bug report now, but if you still think that these lines should be suspicious, please reopen. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/