From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12000: 24.1.50; do not hard-code `bold' font for help output Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:31:56 -0800 Message-ID: <874n49hsgj.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <7D9DB8E6B2CC4312BF6186379903A282@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391917032 2476 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2014 03:37:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 03:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12000@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 09 04:37:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCL9r-0002Cx-T2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:34:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49032 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCL9r-0003eU-G7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCL9j-0003eE-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCL9e-00015S-NR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:34:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44662) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCL9e-00015N-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCL9e-0004og-7e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 03:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12000 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12000-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12000.139191680418448 (code B ref 12000); Sun, 09 Feb 2014 03:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12000) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 03:33:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCL92-0004nU-5N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:33:24 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:33976) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCL90-0004nM-PA for 12000@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:33:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCL8m-0004dy-2f; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:33:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:54:29 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCL8m-0004dy-2f MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392521589.11878@DKf320lKOG7PJRURTsf0rQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85027 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > 2. The screenshot I sent was actually from Emacs 23.3. But the problem has not > changed for Emacs 24 (hard-coded face `bold' remains). > > The only difference is that now face `button' inherits from face `link', so the > appearance is a bit different (blue, not black). If you have a font installed that has an ugly/unreadable bold variant, the fix here is to install a better font. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/