From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Schmidt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17588: 24.3.91; mouse-face glitchy Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 04:35:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <874n0dkkdz@ristopher.com> References: <87lhtpwuh5@ristopher.com> <83a9a5k6dw.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppj1sjz9@ristopher.com> <837g59jmd2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401093404 18151 80.91.229.3 (26 May 2014 08:36:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 08:36:44 +0000 (UTC) To: 17588@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 26 10:36:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqOQ-0008EK-Ud for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 10:36:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55381 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqOQ-0007Mp-9P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:36:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60797) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqOI-0007Lu-I9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:36:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqO3-0006o2-9n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqO3-0006nu-70 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqO2-0008Dk-Jv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Christopher Schmidt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 08:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17588 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.140109334631566 (code B ref -1); Mon, 26 May 2014 08:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2014 08:35:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqNl-0008D1-Db for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:35:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58278) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqNh-0008Ck-PH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:35:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqNX-0006QB-CC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:35:36 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqNX-0006Q2-5k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:35:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqNS-00072s-FL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:35:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqNN-0006Kn-FI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:35:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ristopher.com ([81.4.108.209]:51842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoqNN-0006KD-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:35:21 -0400 Original-Received: by ristopher.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id BDAAA20742; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:35:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <837g59jmd2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 26 May 2014 05:38:01 +0300") Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89494 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > How was your Emacs built? (The information collected by > 'report-emacs-bug' was not present in your report.) No explicit configuration options were used. I used a recent build of the emacs-24 branch for this report. AFAICT bug reports via M-x report-emacs-bug RET in emacs-24 do not expose configuration features beyond what is in system-configuration-options. Using the trunk, where I can reproduce this issue with my recipe as well, I get Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG SOUND DBUS GSETTINGS NOTIFY LIBSELINUX LIBXML2 FREETYPE XFT ZLIB This is what configure says: Configured for `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'. Where should the build process find the source code? . What compiler should emacs be built with? gcc -std=gnu99 -g3 -O2 Should Emacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes (Using Doug Lea's new malloc from the GNU C Library.) Should Emacs use a relocating allocator for buffers? no Should Emacs use mmap(2) for buffer allocation? no What window system should Emacs use? x11 What toolkit should Emacs use? GTK2 Where do we find X Windows header files? Standard dirs Where do we find X Windows libraries? Standard dirs Does Emacs use -lXaw3d? no Does Emacs use -lXpm? yes Does Emacs use -ljpeg? yes Does Emacs use -ltiff? yes Does Emacs use a gif library? yes -lgif Does Emacs use a png library? yes -lpng12 -lz -lm Does Emacs use -lrsvg-2? no Does Emacs use imagemagick? no Does Emacs support sound? yes Does Emacs use -lgpm? no Does Emacs use -ldbus? yes Does Emacs use -lgconf? no Does Emacs use GSettings? yes Does Emacs use a file notification library? yes -lgio (gfile) Does Emacs use access control lists? no Does Emacs use -lselinux? yes Does Emacs use -lgnutls? no Does Emacs use -lxml2? yes Does Emacs use -lfreetype? yes Does Emacs use -lm17n-flt? no Does Emacs use -lotf? no Does Emacs use -lxft? yes Does Emacs directly use zlib? yes Does Emacs use toolkit scroll bars? yes My environment specs can be found in the initial message: In GNU Emacs 24.3.91.3 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10) Repository revision: 117154 eliz@gnu.org-20140525141846-w6719v7ajcd3tbkk Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11204000 This is a Debian GNU/Linux "wheezy" system. This issue can be reproduced with GTK+ 3, too. > Also, can you try running this on some other machine, perhaps a faster > one? I do not have access to any other machine with a window system at the moment. This one: $ grep "model name" /proc/cpuinfo | uniq model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz