From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daimrod Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 19:45:08 +0200 Message-ID: <874mxs6tej.fsf@tanger.home> References: <874myjnjek.fsf@tanger.home> <83bnsi4kw8.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha2a8cet.fsf@tanger.home> <83a9823vhr.fsf@gnu.org> <874mya80u2.fsf@tanger.home> <83fvhpkgbh.fsf@gnu.org> <8761ikn9ch.fsf@tanger.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407174387 7833 80.91.229.3 (4 Aug 2014 17:46:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 17:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18023@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 04 19:46:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XEMKu-0000iH-AS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 19:46:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53936 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEMKt-0002C1-Tl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:46:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEMKm-0002Bf-1x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:46:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEMKg-0003KW-NR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEMKg-0003KO-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XEMKg-0000t3-40 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daimrod Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 17:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18023 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18023-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18023.14071743263362 (code B ref 18023); Mon, 04 Aug 2014 17:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18023) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2014 17:45:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XEMK4-0000s8-Qj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:45:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:45121) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XEMK0-0000rs-V8 for 18023@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:45:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a1so7940684wgh.23 for <18023@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:45:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=46b5bvPt0IjGGK6Ua4d1szFByynqlWr/BpOsnXqn48M=; b=mJLFnimE6ExWFzOnUUUkkRjtww9X3Yo3EMGqGOPnu1iH2J+OSvMQpHsSrgh/90slom U3cTePGANCEYXXfYZPS8ObyHdYUUO/Up/Xz1nGtW6Zcck0AF0y4tD27nsxZuQnN/3mQR uMubUC6sZ/JEIQqOuoLhufE9pWrV6boxv7cZzlusvB9zoGnM9B5GrKf/x4ibYCCaCT07 qDtDCeTg8p+3bI2awsmI37FZbn+ZstShFXoeCTlnYwt93Vw0t5FA794t5k2fHyZWc0Ua vhtoUkY4zmHgP1mgNLdZjke9tg27eR9gj7SmUjsdqUjJ8xqGPiGFeQL7NVm753Jq60Hk BoyQ== X-Received: by 10.180.39.172 with SMTP id q12mr31028618wik.55.1407174311170; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:45:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (reverse-177-95.fdn.fr. [80.67.177.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fq7sm8015103wic.14.2014.08.04.10.45.09 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:45:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8761ikn9ch.fsf@tanger.home> (daimrod@gmail.com's message of "Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:26:54 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92100 Archived-At: Daimrod writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> From: Daimrod >>> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 18023@debbugs.gnu.org >>> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:38:29 +0900 >>> >>> >> > FWIW, it strikes me that "C-q _" is less typing. >>> >> >>> >> It's not consistent and it doesn't really save typing: >>> >> - "SPC _ _" >>> >> - "SPC C-q _" >>> > >>> > I meant "SPC SPC DEL _". As for "SPC _ _", it's of the same length, >>> > so it doesn't save typing, either. >>> >>> It wasn't clear in my initial message so it's my fault. In my patch, I >>> update the latin-postfix input-method so that one can type "SPC _ _" >>> instead of "SPC SPC DEL _". >>> >>> Though I agree that it doesn't save typing compared to the method you >>> proposed, my approach saves typing compared to the current method and I >>> find my method faster to type because it's consistent with the other >>> combinations and it doesn't "break the flow". >> >> I don't necessarily object to the change, I just wanted to point out >> that alternatives better than "SPC SPC DEL _" do exist. > > If everybody agrees, can it be merged? > > My assignment number is #793656 though I don't think it is required for > such a tiny change. ping? -- Daimrod/Greg