From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:19:15 +0100 Message-ID: <874mtxpj18.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87r3x2qyjg.fsf@wanadoo.es> <546973D0.7050306@cs.ucla.edu> <87ioieqxbb.fsf@wanadoo.es> <54697A45.1040505@cs.ucla.edu> <87egt1rhy4.fsf@wanadoo.es> <546A11D5.3090402@cs.ucla.edu> <87a93prfyq.fsf@wanadoo.es> <837fytddih.fsf@gnu.org> <87tx1xptyj.fsf@wanadoo.es> <834mtxbr4t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhn9ps2c.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83wq6taajc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416262792 16946 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 22:19:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 22:19:52 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 23:19:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqUe8-0000sx-IQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:19:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50481 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqUe8-00048P-3g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:19:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39411) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqUdy-00047l-Vr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:19:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqUdt-0004QK-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:19:34 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqUds-0004Q7-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:19:29 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqUds-0000lY-3Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:19:28 +0100 Original-Received: from 132.red-79-158-48.staticip.rima-tde.net ([79.158.48.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:19:28 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 132.red-79-158-48.staticip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:19:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.red-79-158-48.staticip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lumbMGY9soGjD0dYNMv9T9oRuQM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177496 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > emacs-24, please. >> >> The patch does not apply on emacs-24 (4 hunks fail). This can be >> adapted, of course, but then there will be conflicts when merging >> emacs-24 into master. I don't like the idea of forcing someone to fix >> conflicts on areas he most probably don't know. >> >> Since this is a correctness change that solves an hypothetical future >> problem, I'm inclined to check it into master and leave emacs-24 as is. >> >> Opinions? > > How about applying to both (with a suitable "don't merge to trunk" > note on emacs-24)? Not sure how to do that on an effective way. Pushed the change to emacs-24. Let's see how it fares after the next merge.