From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19328: [PATCH] Add mechanism to prompt about unsaved customizations Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:06:32 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <874msz1yxz.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87egs7a5b0.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d27o1h7d.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418475984 8049 80.91.229.3 (13 Dec 2014 13:06:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19328@debbugs.gnu.org, Cameron Desautels To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 13 14:06:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzmOn-0004VW-Ji for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:06:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32988 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzmOn-0001JH-4s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:06:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzmOe-0001J8-46 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:06:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzmOY-0000F0-V5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:06:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzmOY-0000Er-Rx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzmOY-0005xk-E4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19328 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 19328-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19328.141847594522897 (code B ref 19328); Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19328) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2014 13:05:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44425 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzmOH-0005xF-3L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:05:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]:44161) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzmOE-0005x1-6d for 19328@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:05:42 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id s7so6325331qap.34 for <19328@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 05:05:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=lLNwEJXGF5mkcfatoz/k+fVlMhDUQQEoE8byGe1fpCY=; b=GFYDtP5YUUgW+3jcoh+zIjTfMxDQCZakDY1DpqkIhZ6WuLor3/lvZ3OHmX+IULpn7s NezlkpZbfq74pUREnhu/AxqmT/goikyWJLlyguZNbociEHYzmvqeUlScjV6D0gfrQVvW DrsxqgY9PmMNuvO3RaO9DpqNBCqIxcvqlC7Sg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=lLNwEJXGF5mkcfatoz/k+fVlMhDUQQEoE8byGe1fpCY=; b=eqtLiOA7Hb2aQWK+ZJPU0L0lWh4N6ognaT6cQhr4I6b+8UtdfAKha6wU+y376Y624b YsNQpdVN3tBfOW115GcLiN+xfECWKVODkUuQd1UDUtlIWg3A1zjSIubwtFotjk8P34qb uz5tpBBPElPl2u4jmIef94+vhrUNpO3uCvDmO+fLHXFUzz9lPGIo/CKXrOi46ouNcUIy YCaZqtUBDQOJYdDZgXxg9Y0yoKU47vA+F7hMqPz3JfIhU423tj60+Bp5upBczL37dbjw iPdfcWpoVCZKi4Fk+qvN5PqBkrroBeni3wRy0tNYeVySFu3QCXhhyTB1r4CHclzFtV9z Cnug== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlIBTS3CWasHf6CG8mWS+OLRCpuWqBszjyrb3uoUs10AtOTVFCAa+blrLkte87z4A6zYD2t X-Received: by 10.140.84.70 with SMTP id k64mr11173378qgd.76.1418475936510; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 05:05:36 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from flea (c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.229.61.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e45sm4395071qgd.35.2014.12.13.05.05.35 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Dec 2014 05:05:35 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 13 Dec 2014 00:55:08 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97286 Archived-At: On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 00:55:08 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> To make it easier for people to try it, and to format the patch a little >> better, I've pushed it on top of the current master branch in the branch >> scratch/bug19328/custom-prompt-customize-unsaved-options from where it >> can be tried or cherry-picked. SM> No! Please install it into master. SM> This part is not under debate. The only debate is whether to enable it SM> by default. Could you review the commit first? I wasn't sure about the commit message, since it's one commit for several scattered ChangeLogs (and those ChangeLog deltas are not in the commit message details). I think it's reasonable but didn't want to presume. Ted