From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18539: 24.4.50; gnus registry file seems misnamed Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:19:54 +1100 Message-ID: <874mqqp6j9.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <874mvytcq8.fsf@tromey.com> <87ppelm6xa.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87oau5rrj8.fsf@tromey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423815806 1714 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2015 08:23:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18539@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 13 09:23:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMBWq-00048G-CB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:23:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53898 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMBWp-0005fN-79 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:23:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMBWm-0005eP-2t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:23:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMBWg-0003oF-TF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:23:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMBWg-0003oB-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMBWg-0004hl-AQ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18539.142381574518032 (code B ref 18539); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2015 08:22:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41250 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMBW4-0004gl-Bt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:22:24 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.syd.comcen.com.au ([203.23.236.77]:3926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMBW0-0004gX-KE for 18539@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:22:22 -0500 Original-Received: from building.gnus.org ([27.96.197.126]) by smtp.syd.comcen.com.au (8.13.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id t1D8JxPn072062; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:20:00 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87oau5rrj8.fsf@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:01:47 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-comcen-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-comcen-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-comcen-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.12, required 4, AWL 0.02, BAYES_50 0.00, RDNS_NONE 0.10) X-comcen-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99283 Archived-At: Tom Tromey writes: > Yeah, if you do fix the typo, offering to rename the existing file seems > like the friendliest thing to do. Renaming the file might be problematic if you switch between older and newer versions of Emacs, since older versions will still write files with the old name. I say just leave it alone. A registry file by any other name would register just as sweetly. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/