From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20784: 25.0.50; pcase documentation on t and nil Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:33:37 +0200 Message-ID: <874mmev2zi.fsf@web.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1434026069 6321 80.91.229.3 (11 Jun 2015 12:34:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20784@debbugs.gnu.org To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 11 14:34:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z31gY-0000jH-AH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:34:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46417 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z31gS-000326-Lv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z31gM-0002xg-Cl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z31gI-0007Kb-8h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z31gI-0007KT-5I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z31gH-0002ma-O9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20784 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20784-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20784.143402603810687 (code B ref 20784); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20784) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2015 12:33:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z31gD-0002mI-Gs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:33:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:51452) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z31gA-0002m3-CW for 20784@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.187.158.178]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LfzxX-1ZN1gB44S3-00pbUb; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:33:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Artur Malabarba's message of "Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:24:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Cm3yp/yqkxzBy0c7KbeOXl5ZzwvRB+YrR23vhEuaU27TB6K5xja zzsCV2A2bVwUZ/rCL+s8AglxpwgroenECN/ER8jas5F8zhZtWFSIzG3K4R12KfEFkptVwak 8HDLgTt6MDC0PtqvbGG3OH2CMbiP//i+lw/YgMeXWW3bI3Y6NwbOtzFDA1/ievoCqUSFirZ SdqJKvLQO67LexIu6Rcgg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103819 Archived-At: Artur Malabarba writes: > I've also had reports that (pcase something ('nil 1)) complains of > invalid pattern in 24.5, while it works fine for me in 25.0. > Is there a proper way to match nil? If I just use nil, I get errors on > 25, but using 'nil gives errors on 24.5. AFAICT, `nil is the correct way. Michael.