From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about commit policy Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 11:44:44 +0200 Message-ID: <874mm2k92r.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87pp4rj1zd.fsf@gmx.net> <87d20riv7r.fsf@gmx.net> <5584AB5C.6000703@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1434793528 2494 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2015 09:45:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 09:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 20 11:45:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6FKs-0003Ss-Lv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 11:45:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32850 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6FKr-0007sc-PJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 05:45:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6FKf-0007rg-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 05:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6FKa-0000Sz-Th for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 05:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:56386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6FKa-0000St-Kg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 05:44:56 -0400 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([89.245.96.110]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MUkxk-1ZcAMM2XXA-00Y783; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 11:44:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5584AB5C.6000703@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:53:00 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:tMgGl2LZtftCb4kPpvy5cRwkklIsWUYFwSLzhbWhyp3qck5L3+O fIFmBGHw8WUcd6Nhp3ZJdwTXv2/UB9bl7wf+HDsSRqxJc4OOsJgpT7RKY0Mrbtirosm8aKX p9km7ow7Mh8FIjmD7K3mBvOYlnu8LR2PDri1BZ25VLhrDDAGooKbWuv83cA2lmF91hL4Z7h wpjC1usJsymurZ1nP6TNw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:g9iUHfhq3fo=:BUE4fZuZXTC+ivthjnkASv AlQxyfnCmChZNv85EZYWVc75jjYXbOWlrrgispBBMJhi9bvmn52hNwbAmGNz8gRKv8BAgtY0z xqBBt4Xu11UEyCr/B5XDkRiv5MgqeEJkhGPwXbe8d5QkJBUKEQUYxwOuUdfCksBEovAwY1Gai p9pdoKqx7LkwqjVL6P+ZWFm2NVOHmLVnESuV8bAr7+8EQCdT1u9hJ1YLlGMwfIXCNwoEyjZ1N AphP/nWsDfZOroYs9Tegemwz19NVfzTWCPygOd1NQyh/a+7ViMl8YIP6nSSsEgA3LeN1dBxma iXNGlv017zRW3schPc/0QBcHAqe5x7y6NUVtSI9zd7Rg71apza2S8ooZKezu3ssjR8GbL9XSY BVO43bGSGWKsfPFyc16JZFi28lQmotBFzasMBl+Q/wiy/u40Mh/WyqrjTbtb5oVYpa6DzsKoU 1DTCImwFo2Bhxz8DNaCRpXT/yMH/Qts7fidITm0B+XxEFtmnVQ4esjn9aoKxs9QqgV6ejcEdz yjgBGpgg8TQemwW0hWkvJI6os4y0IUgowQff6kwNbiJrdtvs21f3frfV9PNMZI9jvPCtKRT0Z F6CkSqTwJQg2uZtJaaU2vlqwZsiOpcVoIm0Rspw8hs/2Nzw+kotYDWDkFQ7okG6A76fGViWvE RVX6ItjG4Anv5NMD4iMteqqnqgsCdZlbAHjo/O0cReglI1lLgvWzYDcR2af0jy8WKOuY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187337 Archived-At: On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:53:00 -0700 Paul Eggert wrote: > Stephen Berman wrote: >> Thanks. They're safe fixes, so I committed them to emacs-24; hope >> Someone=E2=84=A2 will merge them to master soon;-) > > Thanks, I merged them. These days, people generally fixes like that into= the > master branch, as it makes less work for everybody -- emacs-24 is mostly = dead. Oh, ok. I had understood Stefan as giving me the go-ahead for emacs-24, but on re-reading, I should have considered more the likelihood of another release from that branch. Sorry for the extra work, but thanks for merging. Steve Berman