From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Contributors and maintainers Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:34:50 +0200 Message-ID: <874mhkz3w5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y4exe71v.fsf@gnu.org> <87zizcfzna.fsf@T420.taylan> <20151021.102719.485566340.wl@gnu.org> <871tcoehk2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87eggofmy2.fsf@T420.taylan> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445438130 5465 80.91.229.3 (21 Oct 2015 14:35:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?=) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 21 16:35:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZouTq-0006FX-Uj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:35:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51915 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZouTp-0002FM-4n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:35:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZouTk-0002El-4p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:35:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZouTf-0008SE-2l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:34:59 -0400 Original-Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:36572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZouTe-0008S3-VB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:34:55 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342422020A for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:34:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:34:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=EyB92adK7CYxZHaYiNYeTPMDEQQ=; b=Ylkro qoxLkqSdVGi95gJwe+DcbB3I6vIlZmWwW2bpKNpcHa0fLOi5jFTtM9xRCGSaeNtM 3TCdDvPCzCTm93S2gFABoJ0G26mxbl0r3iKDRAVopFiWSwZbNAj3mMCjKLen8NUB lhu43cIFZP6wstXptEx5HVja7Q4/YG+VeL9gNQ= X-Sasl-enc: Sns4CtDDxSGsEYHSGiJJxmQ1E9AJ+9dUlCGPA6E2Bb2M 1445438093 Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.163.155.96]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1FB19680102; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:34:52 -0400 (EDT) Mail-Followup-To: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay?= =?utf-8?Q?=C4=B1rl=C4=B1=2FKammer=22?=), David Kastrup , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87eggofmy2.fsf@T420.taylan> ("Taylan Ulrich \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Bay\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=22's\?\= message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:03:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.27 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192283 Archived-At: Hi Taylan, I haven't read the complete thread but as far as I understand, your point is that you don't trust `shell-quote-argument' in that it doesn't allow for running arbitrary code when given thoroughly prepared arguments. But you are confident that your shell-quasiquote.el package doesn't allow for that in POSIX-compliant shells. Is that correct? But wouldn't it be better to contribute a set of ERT tests for `shell-quote-argument' in order to increase the trust we can have in it and possibly find and fix problems it might actually have? After all, although you say that shell-quasiquote.el is only intended to be used with POSIX shells, we/you have no control on where it'll actually be used. Bye, Tassilo