From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: noob question on cl-flet. Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:08:53 +0200 Message-ID: <874mawxnxm.fsf@web.de> References: <5d30fc0b-52bf-4cde-baba-2e2235e7c197@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461168571 18818 80.91.229.3 (20 Apr 2016 16:09:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:09:31 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 20 18:09:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1asugq-0004Dm-5S for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:09:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52014 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asugp-00079W-IG for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:09:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asugd-00077b-CJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:09:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asugZ-0005iW-87 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34271) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asugZ-0005iR-1q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1asugX-00040M-DF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:09:01 +0200 Original-Received: from ip-90-186-3-65.web.vodafone.de ([90.186.3.65]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:09:01 +0200 Original-Received: from michael_heerdegen by ip-90-186-3-65.web.vodafone.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:09:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-90-186-3-65.web.vodafone.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3RdtG2W9H9cSIFHC6X3HYGnEW1s= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:109798 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > The binding created by `cl-flet' is not a binding of a Lisp (global) > symbol. It is a local (let-like) lexical binding. @Shiyao (sorry if this is impolite and @Ma would have been correct): A very related question has been discussed just some days ago, see <87pototkq5.fsf@mbork.pl> in thread `pp-eval-expression' behaves strangely under lexical binding This is an equivalent issue, just that we are here speaking of named functions defined in lexical scope vs. the function cell of a symbol. Michael.