From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Triska Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23871: 25.1.50; Undo unexpectedly leads to blank buffer Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 20:09:40 +0200 Message-ID: <874m86h9uj.fsf@metalevel.at> References: <83h9cavdgj.fsf@gnu.org> <87poqyy2tc.fsf@metalevel.at> <87vb0qqrkz.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87h9c9zx75.fsf@metalevel.at> <834m89vmyv.fsf@gnu.org> <878txlsbdb.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87furtccdv.fsf@metalevel.at> <877fd5q9te.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83bn2gtruk.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2h37pvb.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87zipz223y.fsf@metalevel.at> <87a8hzkqp2.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87d1mv9gqm.fsf@metalevel.at> <83r3barc0n.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467569426 11945 80.91.229.3 (3 Jul 2016 18:10:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23871@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 03 20:10:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bJlqR-0005nd-Pw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 20:10:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43643 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJlqQ-0005WZ-He for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 14:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJlqH-0005VH-Ep for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 14:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJlqE-0002Cd-7V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 14:10:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJlqE-0002CZ-4L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 14:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bJlqD-0004Ek-Vc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 14:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Markus Triska Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23871 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23871-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23871.146756938516261 (code B ref 23871); Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23871) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2016 18:09:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36153 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bJlpx-0004EB-DU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 14:09:45 -0400 Original-Received: from metalevel.at ([78.46.218.83]:51451) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bJlps-0004Dz-OE for 23871@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 14:09:43 -0400 Original-Received: by metalevel.at (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3CE70A0277; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:09:40 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83r3barc0n.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:12:40 +0300") User-Agent: Emacs/24.4 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120354 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > AFAICS, 1095 and 21722 report exactly the same problem; 21722 should > have never been opened as a separate bug. So I just merged them > together. You have tagged #21722 as unreproducible now too. Can you reproduce it? All the best, Markus