From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24172: 25.1; Doc of parse-sexp-ignore-comments: what does a value of nil mean? Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 01:28:30 +0200 Message-ID: <874m6xqxy9.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470526173 4832 195.159.176.226 (6 Aug 2016 23:29:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 23:29:33 +0000 (UTC) To: 24172@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 07 01:29:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1r-0008Tr-1G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 01:29:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1n-0007B6-JP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:29:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1g-000749-HX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1a-0006yg-Io for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1a-0006yc-FE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1a-0006xY-4A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 23:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 24172 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.147052612926732 (code B ref -1); Sat, 06 Aug 2016 23:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 23:28:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58219 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1N-0006x5-AP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39045) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1L-0006wt-VX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:28:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1G-0006y5-0m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:28:42 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:51295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1F-0006y1-U2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:28:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB1D-0006oQ-IV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:28:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB17-0006xl-Kq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:28:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:61668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWB17-0006wt-9o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:28:33 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([88.67.73.210]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MhDRB-1bsMjG2VG5-00MNZS for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 01:28:31 +0200 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:auT+Dh+cEgPsFSIVGWeRtrOQgFvUgsEO86JvHaqGsacQyM1Hdx6 qGd3Yjd4XJfhwoFrgCcRdGBdXszejFXu5kE6LeixA4ZVJ4SxdVLHg9m7WfUzt7SQESlqTwL DgAf2lRBp4AOPV9apEzsgpZ1ffRh/9Fc27hS+gBIcQdO3UdvygWL0ODbFeghGFuPceiBdvk gVO7fkVl1jE/gDtSfeqag== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:4dmLQlkSHRk=:dEOu9qtjSZDNjZwsTPXggQ 9szmNz7DQBST9Dt8fmWL4RJ2PPj2EjwFACGSgOH6/RLfcimKJJJZfzRZZ2HXbTlFqe5+0QIPZ PG3bn5QlQYPXZ9DjKpa2FlRtRbVVboF0A6EpeSgBsw0AK/yt/oQrLqsWtBcZsJogSnkalAIBs jkVOMc/x3FiYDbLwOMP+DeiVg1vYBndGbPohRgM/lnhzgXZgKuiu7R++DMx7jNFxnAe7ezeZH y/WY+E3VbZrdELguEHdE8ZRxYQZaw8pcD4lRkQMFWXlZUrFrlrj0GjGpmD0Jn+7dC8JfH38Zl 2/QR5Hxf0ojHiuBCxEdE9+3KmRQI/KFyiWPHW318cOSRne2E62cpPd8kYokgPF/SQwe8+2Fwn 3pf4D2XlfMzTr9zaNY0Dc02qOqDMVfH7ugA0syFKjqVfaBvSgDtpGwrPWAL/bYMlqu8j/iW5o azJIjtrUYTgn0e+sKIq7Msc7yWGVMAgEDDrXO6TePDqc5hQCNZpg1NqEy37UtjA1izrQbDXCW 2MRdFv4IAiE6/iowut6g2l/IzN5JN+IPMvZ2zxOgN038HTT+ptnkOaGv/GBHOoJxVo3nnKGs9 emCB3jzATYQhKDC+bmhoSnimME3jZXSX8+/c5JdwiAHeYImtyfRKzAIS5JxFAdF75DWXbY724 J75oZ/Rf5DCc49Z1mtU+Et7FxoCDr2HxgTNij6jEOj4Bowg0nCt22/V4mLADMyLnEo0yipmdz nHvh8uYctRTMlYamaq1bp1fnHzNlJUZjDsNAj+n6jk6w9YHBktjD2EGRheXs0hF7sZBky+Os X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121921 Archived-At: Hello, in the docstring of `parse-sexp-ignore-comments' (or at least in the manual), I miss a description about what a value of nil exactly means: How are comments treated then? Are they treated as separate units that can then be parsed as well, but separately from code, or are they treated as indistinguishable from code? For example, if parsing starts from within a comment, and parsing finds the end of the comment and is not yet finished, is parsing just continued inside the following code, or does it fail? Thanks in advance, Michael. In GNU Emacs 25.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.20.6) of 2016-08-04 built on drachen Repository revision: 72221f51439d666d54f5d147f00ecdbb3778ab1b Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11804000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG IMAGEMAGICK SOUND DBUS GSETTINGS NOTIFY LIBXML2 FREETYPE XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS GTK3 X11