From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:50:45 +0100 Message-ID: <874m11wk56.fsf@linux-m68k.org> References: <15CF14CC-C7DE-44BA-AC7D-F0BF1F160979@raeburn.org> <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <831swxzbw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3z2wphb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw9bb42m.fsf@gnu.org> <349ED8B9-C34B-495B-9FB5-E72CE6EFCA38@raeburn.org> <87inpni6xa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <8360lmesso.fsf@gnu.org> <3B044D64-7C94-42D7-BE1B-7A9CA76C5A67@raeburn.org> <83k29xc49v.fsf@gnu.org> <83eg05c32y.fsf@gnu.org> <87inphx29r.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83a8atbxl9.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1fpwu95.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <837f5xbl0r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484419900 13875 195.159.176.226 (14 Jan 2017 18:51:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 18:51:40 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 19:51:36 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSTQN-00038S-Hr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:51:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSTQS-0006K4-0R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSTPl-0006Jz-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:50:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSTPk-0002YE-0r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:50:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:35461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSTPg-0002Vm-A3; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:50:52 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3v17qW5yg2z3hjGj; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:50:47 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3v17qW4dfzzvknY; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:50:47 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bSKuAfrJV2ea; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:50:46 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: n6GpZzXdkPnEwYQ8IenCQHoIEQ501yLK+0enr/NW/fE8kdkV8YLbKxAHhxl0q83d Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-30-182.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.30.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:50:46 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8190F2C3E22; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:50:45 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: --``I love KATRINKA because she drives a PONTIAC. We're going away now. I fed the cat. - Zippy'' In-Reply-To: <837f5xbl0r.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:37:24 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211295 Archived-At: On Jan 14 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:22 +0100 >> >> >> It is as bogus as every Lisp error. >> > >> > On the contrary: most of them provide useful information about the >> > error locus. This one clearly didn't. >> >> It accurately tells you the form that caused the error, something you >> never get from a Lisp error. > > It's accurate, but utterly useless. No, it isn't. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."