From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Engster <deng@randomsample.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Disable emacs-diffs mails for scratch branches
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 10:59:16 +0100
Message-ID: <874m0inq4r.fsf@engster.org>
References: <87sho3zewk.fsf@engster.org> <87inoy61gz.fsf@mouse>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485684024 7020 195.159.176.226 (29 Jan 2017 10:00:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 10:00:24 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 11:00:18 2017
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1cXmHI-0000V9-95
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:00:08 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54683 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1cXmHN-0000Ep-Kc
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 05:00:13 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54171)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <deng@randomsample.de>) id 1cXmGo-0000Ej-Dp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 04:59:39 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <deng@randomsample.de>) id 1cXmGj-0000DM-IL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 04:59:38 -0500
Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:45087)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <deng@randomsample.de>)
	id 1cXmGj-0000Bx-8a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 04:59:33 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=randomsample.de; s=a; 
	h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From;
	bh=bpfVVnp8NuJhOy42DGYyhflMEgVDrLnSkCtgc3KpOkQ=; 
	b=iu/EQevZFCyYan5e/H40Nc69FJVnxJxQRa1VOsMdpuTncfI94ULzfqz32F8b8wQE+Yn+JXpB49AtG7U93ZpPdivGXHsh8X8cxLUVf52Vey5q0Pl5td2wlhHMmY2sp7ha;
Original-Received: from ip4d16b353.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.22.179.83]
	helo=isaac)
	by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
	(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <deng@randomsample.de>)
	id 1cXmGa-0007RD-AC; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 10:59:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87inoy61gz.fsf@mouse> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 29
	Jan 2017 03:31:40 +0100")
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy]
X-Received-From: 5.45.97.173
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211720
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/211720>

Lars Ingebrigtsen writes:
> David Engster <deng@randomsample.de> writes:
>
>> Subject says it all. Could we please do that? 
>
> Can't you just kill-file the messages you're not interested in?  I mean
> score down.  That's what I do with the scratch/ branches...

Yeah sure, I do that as well. It's just that I'm kinda old-school and
think that force-pushing an amended commit shouldn't trigger 300
mails...

But since this doesn't seem to be easily changed, I guess we just live
with it.

-David