Re: Is it possible let child-frame not hide the mode-line and minibuffer out

["Feng Shu" <tumashu@163.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 825 bytes --]

martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> writes:

>> When a child-frame move to position (-1 . 0), it will hide its
>> parent-frame's mode-line and minibuffer, is it possible let child-frame
>> auto move above a little, and let it not hide its parent-frame's
>> mode-line and minibuffer?
>
> I'm not sure why a position like (-1 . 0) should do that - did you
> mean (0 . -1)?
>
> But what is "auto" move?  Positioning and sizing of child frames is
> completely left to the caller with one exception: When the parent
> frame is resized, the child frame may have to be resized and
> repositioned too.  IIRC we try to do that proportionally so it's
> possible that the parent frame's mode line gets obscured.  Is it that
> you had in mind?
>
sorry, it is (0 . -1) :-)

If I move a child-frame to (0 . -1), it like this at the moment:


[-- Attachment #2: 1.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 80460 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 86 bytes --]



but I think the below result is more useful when I move a child-frame to
(0 . -1)



[-- Attachment #4: 2.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 62595 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #5: Type: text/plain, Size: 19 bytes --]




> martin
>

--