From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Thorpe Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 11:54:04 +0100 Message-ID: <874l5ipzxv.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> References: <87d0k7s8g5.fsf@mail.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="57600"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Stefan Huchler Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 25 12:54:32 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hUUJp-000Ep9-0O for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 12:54:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39101 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUUJn-0005dC-Lv for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 06:54:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53663) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUUJa-0005d5-UM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 06:54:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUUJZ-0008P5-US for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 06:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from outbound-smtp15.blacknight.com ([46.22.139.232]:36689) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUUJZ-0008Lq-PH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 06:54:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.blacknight.com (unknown [81.17.255.152]) by outbound-smtp15.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34DD1C2B4A for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 11:54:04 +0100 (IST) Original-Received: (qmail 28970 invoked from network); 25 May 2019 10:54:04 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO RTLaptop) (rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com@[51.37.107.198]) by 81.17.254.9 with ESMTPSA (AES128-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 25 May 2019 10:54:04 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87d0k7s8g5.fsf@mail.de> (message from Stefan Huchler on Sat, 25 May 2019 02:07:22 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 46.22.139.232 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120637 Archived-At: Stefan Huchler writes: > > Does that make sense? I think it does. So, there will be no timeout. Instead Ctrl is sticky until the next key is pressed, but not after that. I could see that working. BR, Robert Thorpe