From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Org syntax inside verbatim/literal blocks Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 16:36:58 +0200 Message-ID: <874l2f5051.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87tvaqduwe.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87wofmf4z3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pnledpdf.fsf@gmail.com> <87ef1mg829.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lfvuohr8.fsf@gmail.com> <87r25j53h3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d0h36gf0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54715) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hyzpH-0005p4-Ot for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 10:37:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyzpG-0004Jq-ED for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 10:37:03 -0400 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:36805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyzpG-0004J3-8h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 10:37:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d0h36gf0.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsWgdMSbcMOhbiBOxJtt?= =?utf-8?B?ZWMiJ3M=?= message of "Sat, 17 Aug 2019 16:00:03 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec writes: > Hm, but the version in my patch does seem to work correctly, i.e. it is > exported as (snipped) > > You need to exit by pressing @kbd{C-c '} again@footnote{@cindex escape c= haracter > @cindex comma > Upon exit, lines starting with @samp{*}, @samp{,*}, @samp{#+} and @samp{= ,#+} get > > ... which seems to produce a valid info file (looks the same as before > and the index entries work). Is it just a corner case, not a feature? You must be right then. I assumed @cindex could not fit into @footnote but I stand corrected. Regards,