From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38154: Man-follow-manual-reference could be as sharp as M-x man itself Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:57:31 +0100 Message-ID: <874kz7q9tg.fsf@gnus.org> References: <871ruhwb5o.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83tv7d82qx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="157781"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 38154@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 06:58:35 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iV89K-000evk-NB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:58:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53662 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iV89H-00033X-MZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:58:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iV88r-00033J-E1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:58:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iV88p-0003sU-11 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:58:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iV88n-0003ri-SL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iV88n-0002an-Pt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:58:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38154 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38154-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38154.15737110639925 (code B ref 38154); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38154) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2019 05:57:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iV88V-0002a1-Ge for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:57:43 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:49750) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iV88T-0002Zi-0N for 38154@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:57:41 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iV88K-0000oO-In; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:57:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83tv7d82qx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Nov 2019 17:53:58 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171538 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Sure, I'll tell the authors to use >> >> SEE ALSO >> v.segment(1grass), v.split(1grass), v.to.rast(1grass), v.to.db(1grass) >> >> but in the meantime, Man-follow-manual-reference should be beefed up... > > FWIW, I'm not at all sure. It's an invalid man page (a.k.a. "bug"), > so why should we support it? Yeah, I don't think Man-follow-manual-reference should guess that much here. It makes sense for M-x man to guess though, so I don't think there's anything to fix here, and I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no