From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Bernoulli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package proposal: git-modes Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:05:42 +0200 Message-ID: <874k99exzd.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <875ytuyzmk.fsf@bernoul.li> <871r4fzfyq.fsf@posteo.net> <87k0i5ex9j.fsf@bernoul.li> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17856"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas , rms@gnu.org, Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 22 20:09:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mdyzM-0004Rm-Am for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:09:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45740 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdyzK-0003BX-U4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:09:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdyvR-0001o9-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:49462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdyvO-0003FE-7d; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8E11616D; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:05:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received :received; s=sel2011a; t=1634925944; bh=XmP8eljzlCcT5m1vNctdFP0G MiLqxgxbbBjRC8/Heo0=; b=icKoYFmJjqI66dtTR5Dm0u+WtS13bjC8mX3WIMvK s31P3kNjCVT43Rqpgpo4d3kMp1xrsoubnjYwfmiJKAe6ZLGnzu2XjhRqjDJ+HPUH mt1c1/CdrMg1Gb72FLyTnWCVlWRWIb/i+I9zLbXOtB02meC8ea9UbHAoP6uKflH3 scY= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id TIM8aPyuqNlo; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:05:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 750FB160CE; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:05:44 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277575 Archived-At: > I have gitignore-mode running locally, but I'm not sure the syntax > highlighting it does have is very helpful. I don't really have an opinion on the matter. I am not the original author and for the most part just fixed bugs. Some of the additional font-lock sugar seems unnecessary to me too. (If I remember correctly the only reason I agreed to become the maintainer of these modes is that it was part of the deal that allowed me to integrate various git-commit.el implementations into the one in magit. And that in turn I only wanted to do because the most popular implementation injected bugs into magit via monkey patches and while its author refused to stop doing that he offered to completely handover the package (plus git{config,ignore}.el) to me.)