From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Development Speed Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:50:47 +0100 Message-ID: <874k6zwsy0.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87sfulx86y.fsf@telefonica.net> <87zgotos6d.fsf@yahoo.com> <87o858yle4.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30572"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:YwRlYI+N1ZRay3QcECIyi1rnT1o= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 23 10:53:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0KmX-0007lA-G6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:53:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53710 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0KmW-0006kU-BH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 04:53:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Kkc-0004r5-9k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 04:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:56376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0KkZ-0002fk-8q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 04:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0KkQ-00056F-Qq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:50:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282900 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > How much RAM that machine has? Do you think it is justified to keep > > Windows-9X support on Emacs for just a few anecdotal uses? > > We do. So you insist on supporting an obsolete, bug-ridden, unsecure and *proprietary* OS with Emacs users numbers that probably range on the single digits because... why? Do you think that the reasons about availability of cheap used machines on underprivileged communities that were valid 20 years ago maybe need an update? > You are free to disagree, You are so gracious, thank you. > but you're not going to convince us by raging. Here we go again, misrepresenting and insulting people who don't align with your view.