From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60796: 27.1; Opening file ending in .sh inside a directory ending in .deb causes hang/100% thread usage Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 18:04:38 +0100 Message-ID: <874jsrhgpl.fsf@gmx.net> References: <83r0vx8tud.fsf@gnu.org> <61adad5b-5871-4d3b-bbad-61ccb1262a42@caseyconnor.org> <83h6wt8s8a.fsf@gnu.org> <875yd9xszo.fsf@gmx.net> <87zgajomn6.fsf@gmx.de> <87h6wrhjpb.fsf@gmx.net> <87mt6jok46.fsf@gmx.de> <87cz7fhiyd.fsf@gmx.net> <87ilh7ojjt.fsf@gmx.de> <878ri3hi32.fsf@gmx.net> <87bkmzoibq.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9217"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Casey Connor , 60796@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 15 18:05:34 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pH6Rp-0002CV-Uh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 18:05:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pH6RR-0001KH-4F; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 12:05:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pH6RK-0001Jt-4f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 12:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pH6RJ-0002vR-Pi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 12:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pH6RJ-0006yF-KW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 12:05:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 17:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60796 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 60796-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60796.167380229026773 (code B ref 60796); Sun, 15 Jan 2023 17:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60796) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2023 17:04:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59481 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pH6R8-0006xl-9f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 12:04:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:46757) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pH6R6-0006xX-KB for 60796@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 12:04:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1673802279; bh=GM8DPswaiBtOZKm50cISrq/W7mrMrRL4hEY5lPzDXe0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=pSQkCPa+hra3U72EjZMkSrxZlZHrWLcz3YvsERmcqK6gacvpLiRx1Gd0CB9soVwQv CUbNly1h3JKolZabIeIOP8Es6zsn3DkIvLolvf1xEVqLuQIOXRCpTKb3sfjCkJ/nJh e8Th0kSf/O8ymN3uov8YrnOVofw1FzRtyLKuj5wmvEBp1OUIYPaeQrpeJWxqTBCiX1 Ep04021NTL53J/XIHjw90V1gaFMnFdEvPsRzlSj4s/Ip7Y2QPWUrEr1H5slglD3rDx zPK1m4okMCku0sBet4A1a1cB0kjKjDvEk3v6cx9dSGzze6onDwBZIZ6AmXnsbzcRWs aIvWHvOZp4RLQ== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from strobelfs ([89.246.38.130]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mel3t-1ohDus2gC5-00aigk; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 18:04:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87bkmzoibq.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Sun, 15 Jan 2023 17:47:53 +0100") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Azt40aAY+WZd3jA+6sg07WrKVasW3Pb5eZ4nDBEluDXuMiSxlXU jlPqyWPqIh+O7FXYchrhu3aj0CZUIC/Md/oSGGZWbnpSgqd/w2lREorAYEsbyQM0r03x1wW jFLvxZONC14qYFCYj8XNFd95V7lnOfJDF3vbIAKdPwzWyy8NPEClygGujlTPuE6o8k0axkJ S9/uIA2vjzK1LYNMXu/Ag== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:qMckh503N3A=;83cUcUdfwzAsMjf2m5kICLD7kSU QQ5xBO7tnlhlqJqt38fLzURP3dT9AhPPrkd3HjvfnNqtx5lN9AR8Jsi7daZZSRsSslTWM+xs7 bk0IwpEBMCHpWI/aM8K/qBRUGsutn2AFqPhiRCWFdbx0xwO5hs9s4Z+knU0ZZMn/cPka87+yh J2VmPRKauLq6BfVB6jdtIkdqt3HeIY6cGvLIJevudEdVPBFddCKDl5gGRulVOqBWIh9S1Xuq0 WdOstXCAegXjJH+CZqiG4XpSUfp2xZdg6ShauhAjiiqgzPgsOcYU0o/wb9tR447xyy8d99hPO zJPSw44aRHvIZaEqyLf4Jz1b6n0iuIIfXcmAc5HXmVtmtLaHxuBHWhIvST+rx10XnovbCqotG CAsFRat5U/mNZskkw+c21F/VXKGSuCXwiaFmeJgzoW3HXcVbZrnE9E1tY79Nr05FG+wWCEKAc pSqyhY0k9n8enjhelmDs8diy3cdxVyhNYCleFPSTLFf8lhZpbHyD0b0rMET2LwqmOIlp8Dtaq j5xiiMhZhwtRMTMKbmGUta3U9I8BeYPw+9pBtDXST+dAKliqRtW21WQayQvshjRGTj9mbvuEL xPkOTWNaV1r3AEB73cNliXvsxQbg0yfD+r0vJU+DWXfuSJ6yLgDqyBW6pyBas3Y1GaayvLg5H aVIBe8wHif6ALfsoLYXvUmKoH05+l1JKaVK2rlfxH/DuaFhVnmij7/RhH4W/0rMdi1i/tEXfw UWlGibfQRz+g14i6eHZllkos8p14eOoFxlNCx1UlI1ud5Zn4mDGohSEmnyOKbbvHDL+Drbo2 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:253441 Archived-At: On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 17:47:53 +0100 Michael Albinus wrote: > Stephen Berman writes: > > Hi Stephen, > >>> Strange. As said, I don't see it in my Emacs 27 build of the git tree. >>> >>> Given, that you (and I) haven't seen the problem in newer Emacs/Tramp >>> versions, I don't know what to test else. Perhaps we shall assume that >>> it is fixed meanwhile (although I hate it not to know the reason)? >> >> It's good that it's apparently not an issue for current Emacs, yet it >> does seem odd that in Emacs 27 some see the problem and others don't, >> and even if it has been fixed (or just disappeared), it would be >> interesting to track down the problem. If anyone has any other ideas >> how to go about that, I'm willing to try them. (But please not >> bisecting between Emacs 27 and 28, I don't have time for that.) > > One workaround we could offer is using the current Tramp from ELPA > (2.6.0) with Emacs 27. Do you want to test this combination? I installed Tramp from ELPA, then invoked Emacs 27 as before but instead of loading tramp-archive.elc from the Emacs 27 build I loaded the one from ELPA. But Emacs 27 still immediately locked up. So do I have to do something else? Steve Berman