From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:37:24 +0000 Message-ID: <874jkerxgb.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <97224c4f-fad4-ae01-46c1-5755d97d9a92@gutov.dev> <87fs3ztq38.fsf@localhost> <87cyz3qwba.fsf@posteo.net> <8734zztmiz.fsf@localhost> <87sf7zqs3l.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il8vs6e7.fsf@localhost> <87jztbqrc9.fsf@yahoo.com> <877cpbs5a0.fsf@localhost> <87fs3zqqgj.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jkfs4o0.fsf@localhost> <87bkenqprn.fsf@yahoo.com> <87v8curzxm.fsf@localhost> <87ledqp69i.fsf@yahoo.com> <87jztaryzk.fsf@localhost> <87a5u6p4n3.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16455"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Philip Kaludercic , Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Kangas , Danny Freeman , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 12:37:42 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1X3-00044R-Tx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 12:37:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1WJ-00061Z-VS; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 06:36:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1WI-0005zF-OL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 06:36:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1WE-0007qa-45 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 06:36:54 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF00D240028 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:36:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693564608; bh=ciNvra4dyjO36wja98P9MMUJjil+TD8ePn3UwDbJ1MU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=WyUWCo7zSPAXAGku5L9DSZCyE1XB4kj15hsaWzwzzAzpssMVeY0Vlve5zYIa1xruq /bSjW4RnqwpxuY1FY6ux1TrPYWGaucY3XOc2B+xHoQSZwqJgd95IrPgAtgyZMDt/tU V+Ckscz0xJCSqSZ3wvkIN2qdyiUXjpvj6AogxeRJjsBsPGd5eTSwgZyXoifGtoZXdg QqZKNRI6UWWlNF8mtB47GwpRA+FCeGKz85RjTAaOCWoqQf4JE4PGVlELNxpBcBQ5p8 rfNBFnnG3MvHMNga+dXi59eVGbE9KGsVECYxGM+L+oPo/6FP4YPOsnz/6MFcfZZQkA 0VdmhD2jxpQOw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RcZG64zYzz6twr; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:36:46 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87a5u6p4n3.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309754 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: >> not the case for all people, but it is really hard to jump in with >> random seemingly unrelated request for someone like me). > > So we are obliged to sign up for more trouble, because of certain > individuals' ungrounded and moreover untrue qualms about etiquette? > Wouldn't we be better served by explaining how that _is_ acceptable? This is not about etiquette. This is about personal feelings. Whether acceptable for you or not, it is something very real and affects human behaviour. And what do you mean by "sign up for more trouble"? What I essentially asked for - "It would be nice if anyone can subscribe to an individual thread anonymously." I am not 100% sure why mailing list software does not have such feature, but the fact that web forges do have it is one of the objective reasons why they are viewed as more comfortable option. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at