From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:17:20 +0100 Message-ID: <874jdm8l7z.fsf@web.de> References: <8734t6n4r5.fsf@web.de> <8734t6shpa.fsf@web.de> <87r0gqa175.fsf@epfl.ch> Reply-To: Michael Heerdegen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20694"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 69533@debbugs.gnu.org, Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 04 09:18:50 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3X8-0005D4-Fu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:18:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3Wj-0005iD-Al; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 03:18:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3Vt-0005MR-5V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 03:17:33 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3Vs-0002Hm-So for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 03:17:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3WM-0005Qe-Aq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 03:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 08:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69533 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69533-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69533.170954025620812 (code B ref 69533); Mon, 04 Mar 2024 08:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69533) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2024 08:17:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41828 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3Vw-0005Pb-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 03:17:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:49557) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3Vu-0005PG-OI for 69533@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 03:17:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1709540210; x=1710145010; i=michael_heerdegen@web.de; bh=SDrnsjLSRwnWMQLXqvpeGxKxt+ro7s5ElzdmJwulpUE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Date; b=tEzl23tMXquC8vR+3Klmi0Aj4hX5hM/DoQvFfohgKFK+xOgmOv4aeD6o9TKOk6bA EyhO46GzbEpNVcCp01XBYhR+SoAjhTJP5tvJmo8Bv2KoFHOm/AvBZWX4LCAGDVnpC OYUwraxqliQ8WvB3G56nXH86SKMNhGiWiKDGul1VmDKzkYFAVa/npXsi3hgJpBcNe fvU68VLbYeMjsKI8Q+NbNqn4iDYIsuHSi+qCy9QMcZTL2gxVasegCbYcGTlrE9fc9 gbfcyswRB3nSB8rrukletpI9ogrOqj3bYhhC5L2fjoQvFHAQh4/fk4F7pOy8UqYuf zAVI63OWD+RPo+WqCQ== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.76.229.82]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MDv9a-1rXC8E170G-00AA8L; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:16:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r0gqa175.fsf@epfl.ch> (Basil L. Contovounesios's message of "Mon, 04 Mar 2024 08:46:54 +0100") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:t0dVGpPrZYGS/NVJLCxlvYnvT6ZigA9r+lwMaUw3fI5xlUDPUsv 0c4V7hMrdQGw4oKykiRlhuSdXARgX4KXqnTUrCdD6PUWJWmyVirB2MxaNWbcBjwF8YJKS7V BJPnXc+tS+KfYj+InmMVu8FqMfJYu5PJUO1legwuhh2vTAH/d7DDMXJRTmJ4gVTbXm/QZ/j grl3jyskPDv+bRJWVo68Q== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:/esiN7hnlt0=;PwtOIqJuv4u4qzW/dATEgIvFZiD iTIOgXU25p28VZpqm86g5uJk8j/gFtyIpTWOsiDsReGZHEvo8a5p/mvTSINzyBLvtJaj++LmW LDBdqA22Y4pgQmg6B3ebyzd0ZAjxqpTQIhbsbD5AARIof4yZ+NpwgZ8wyDOfg9qVPsYWjBzYY uGu9O3hMzr0ahgWTzSFJPOVKzykT0k+uMKhDa596yQ/47k1BWqYHTj5IGZWm21iC9JclthxO2 2DmIxoJTMTckpTTipbopgR69yI/Q1YQ9jUYprMVLyo0kaR7tC1C092v/1dKE/MU1egAiJOqyD UPagc8oMdPmw0k8QjeAYMdSSSksQVZrdPLfWKATOZAiiz+sDx/97SXzef1GutlsOoFlkti8ub z2og2ohtq+cyKyqvQIEgziFEgDqKeincexxQW4dJ3uc7Ifyyko8eiHeDpnfmOLhAllRDKpIdi RNRrH5kKhnmCyV51BCNQEorCsfNfCh4hW4C88+FHFQ1zUUW68cMdJ/XPP3vT31X1LmxSaQdjF hw+RPoSILMMnOp8UUwjxSZ1cPFtN3lVVspQXrTYzEZrsduPhBxTLpI9V9NRfvenvq/dc8XQEe m8aTSKHFEjWmXoXullp+eFNR45bftzwYpzzu+EGe7CxXiMb5wp6ceRP1s0XOReyvB/tDcoQ1W zWM0yfezxROkH4AgCgu+3MKagq7ODpm7/FqfzrO7Oq4E2aVcct8llDxbWLDVqjdoLbjI0alkr YijoJdeSEpyc6bzUMQMY5zBGNAkWE/LQ1lJK52EsuRpn5FqqSmHH5Hl0g34vkYvhL5wnsuF7 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280986 Archived-At: "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > FWIW, my guilty pleasure is using this calling convention with > a non-literal form, e.g.: > > (define-advice foo (:around (&rest args) my-foo) > (with-something (apply args))) Hmm, I realize now that I have used this convention all the time, too, without thinking about it (it just worked...), in the same situation. Instead of - what? - (apply #'funcall args)? But I would not say I like it. Michael.