From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.security.oss.general Subject: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 15:05:21 +0800 Message-ID: <874jccjpvy.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25350"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs@packages.debian.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, oss-security@lists.openwall.com To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 08 09:06:32 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rtj5K-0006Js-0V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 09:06:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rtj4h-0006lx-38; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 03:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rtj4d-0006lj-LV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 03:05:48 -0400 Original-Received: from wfhigh8-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.159]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rtj4Q-00067D-6i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 03:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FDD1800146; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 03:05:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 Apr 2024 03:05:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to; s=fm1; t=1712559929; x=1712646329; bh=6GEsiJbYTrzxWbYGErw7/ 96Fdk62LZyBpwbYXlLH46c=; b=ENqQwVUomUmHPR6yl1l8QuJXd85SNVa2gzgnr gtCnSyHTf0BBF5FBPsprKVaVP4FSvCCVItcjZ7AiRYzbxVtZy8SH0E80BQVneoJR xxYyMGbp9NHMPDjk2+y2othECsdBv3Z+aTqZcEqcrqOB4DvZjR8oc1YkG6zy18oB t+le4P+53p0uH9CS7piELNpg88lrm6HZacEMbYswYds9VYAhF2xIynL3Jue9yV/q Yl3eTqQffXUpTZCdAPAgknSoToItxEAceg1Q4ZjK6oP4XnrG1aZEwjnb0lBctxcM NTWHanwqULoAXf/NcB62D9e50nfBLOBZMqWOwPj722aBfuyTA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1712559929; x=1712646329; bh=6GEsiJbYTrzxWbYGErw7/96Fdk62LZyBpwb YXlLH46c=; b=bs9/ra5ApvfssrroH9wRSR4PpA4khhbt6oGKvrFC9CfFJUB5Vu3 9kS2vy7ZSwgDn76eHWPnMk8kebHLai1y7eg+CcTFCXV0Gh4ECpxtCAtuZZvW80pd Jq9LsGXAuxL6QH3F5SHezn63Iw8U7tA848MdlRamyj4ijZocGmJWh5ZSTY8Xc/37 onSuadMqeGdeXo9mmGK13vl5978983KL4GJ2d3GXZwHMi4ks5srN6ntF9N5+g8HL bhcX+4Fp1yVfMWXCvyntZbiU7yzM2NRQLfZZ1KEwL7bsA9uSPYUC/WaxeGS+zizF uJ3z4phJ9i9PYdHFGIWxB+Ut9JJwfPnXxbA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudeghedguddugecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvvefufffkfgggtgesghdttd ertdertdenucfhrhhomhepufgvrghnucghhhhithhtohhnuceoshhpfihhihhtthhonhes shhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelleejjeelleejie ekjeejiefhjeeviedtleefgfektedvffegffeigeeuveffkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhh hithhtohhnrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i23c04076:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 03:05:28 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC4CB7E4BF4; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:05:22 +0800 (CST) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.159; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=wfhigh8-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317598 gmane.comp.security.oss.general:30081 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Ihor, The description for CVE-2024-30203 is In Emacs before 29.3, Gnus treats inline MIME contents as trusted. and for CVE-2024-30204 is In Emacs before 29.3, LaTeX preview is enabled by default for e-mail attachments. but I think these commits * ccc188fcf98..: Ihor Radchenko 2024-02-20 * lisp/files.el (untrusted-content): New variable. * 937b9042ad7..: Ihor Radchenko 2024-02-20 * lisp/gnus/mm-view.el (mm-display-inline-fontify): Mark contents untrusted. * 6f9ea396f49..: Ihor Radchenko 2024-02-20 org-latex-preview: Add protection when `untrusted-content' is non-nil fix only a single problem, right? But we have two CVEs. It seems to me that either =2D CVE-2024-30203 is just bogus, based on a misunderstanding by the CVEs assigner of exactly what the vulnerabilities were =2D CVE-2024-30203 is legitimate, and we have only fixed one possible way in which Gnus treats inline MIME content as trusted. I think it's the first one -- can you confirm? Thanks. =2D-=20 Sean Whitton --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmYTlzEZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQIKhD/9S9yvUe4fFcTWKEFAGwXrC xa5zjkoWIxPQK7ZS/4y1yyM8DwYCH+pw5i1Fcbo76hJhAYMIlLxPU9Gk3abIXIiN k4AzVqcjmDKKd7NmQ3RkAlozYtgDoN9cLjgy21TmfGMxGFEKTJ1467cRbFq/ZM3U yBQZK7k7qrCKX9fZP1hTavx+KA72IMYhSZJ3+B/QX0KZTFeAqN41bVe6hctzthIs aX5HMuL6adeVuO18k0ra7Kaw1mfrYYiN//YpFuVdjdcuXACTgBL4ZXBOdBkdKHDq duPCx/Eg0xbHd53BzVHOvYczT5erl2xojyuJ44gyyFGMcDvaBBRvWXjOJhNDMNoF BtRd9/moZkVlIRsv1zbOEYmCpdsMb7KU5vDPpKCwo8SG5tfP+bMWbrRHFJ+NqJm4 opu0TDRFtjuqk1jG7CXYQv56V+X/NR0R3zik413MPv3c/kOUeWA1Q3O5rk3IjDUl AdQR1o2PZeTW/pq3Ho4QK/iz+AWEMUWYnTF+Mg1m56G67sqQmBnwn13MascfNF8M 3FAyLMgNRBr1WbYq2j+cQgGJ2LCqhFHPCz1BQ5pyJqcEGNevm/3iFoWg6Pqx0CCD Nm50AHWeE1bi8CnYC6xqK9BFr2BQiA+MTMxtWr/G72cdBMNUDUP516WwIOfLadxR pyfVaBqs6tsbV9QMHVe/ug== =EejD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--