From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ECB Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:48:21 -0500 Message-ID: <873bhukxrv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1141750201 7828 80.91.229.2 (7 Mar 2006 16:50:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 16:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 07 17:49:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGfNI-00055P-2e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:49:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGfNF-00051p-Oz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:49:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FGfMO-0004zm-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:48:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FGfMK-0004wN-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:48:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGfMI-0004uz-M5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:48:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.25] (helo=tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FGfOt-0006E0-3K; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:51:07 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.48.80.201]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060307164821.OXHX18394.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:48:21 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2E51AD7304; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:48:21 -0500 (EST) Original-To: In-Reply-To: (klaus berndl's message of "Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:48:10 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51325 Archived-At: > But for now: Are there some work-arounds possible how to exclude some > windows from being "balanced" (means ajusted) by the new balance-window? > In the old one an advice for `walk-windows' was enough which simply does > not walk through these special windows... But now, `walk-windows' is not > used but `window-tree'... balance-windows should obey `window-size-fixed'. I don't know whether it does, and neither do I know whether ECB can use it. Stefan