From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:36:06 +0900 Message-ID: <873aslsck9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <20071230122217.3CA84830B9A@snark.thyrsus.com> <4pd9g15e.fsf@blue.sea.net> <87r6g7z3m2.fsf@everybody.org> <87odbbngr8.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20080125231308.57E9A30303@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201304196 6176 80.91.229.12 (25 Jan 2008 23:36:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, stephen@xemacs.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: ams@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 26 00:36:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JIY6P-0001cF-O2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:36:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIY5z-0000bC-7p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:36:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIY5v-0000au-Er for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:36:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIY5u-0000aE-3F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:36:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIY5t-0000aB-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:36:21 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp11.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.73]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JIY5i-0004D4-A8; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:36:10 -0500 Original-Received: from 203-216-99-223.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.99.223] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp11.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1JIY5f-0000T4-QT; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:36:07 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B81662F6A; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:36:06 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <20080125231308.57E9A30303@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> (Alfred M. Szmidt's message of "Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:13:08 +0100 (CET)") Original-Lines: 18 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87527 Archived-At: "Alfred M. Szmidt" writes: > GNU projects should use and thus support other GNU projects, as a > matter of loyalty. So if bzr becomes a GNU package, we should use > bzr. > > For the record, we have tla which does what bzr does. I'd hope bzr would be at least a _bit_ better, given that it's explicitly an attempt to rewrite tla from scratch and fix its problems (or at least problems as canonical perceived them). I don't know that I like the idea of an inferior system being promoted simply because it has an arbitrary label attached though... -Miles -- 97% of everything is grunge