Re: CamelHump word movement in Emacs

[Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org>]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

>> Is it ok to commit?
>
> It needs to add some compatibility aliases or adjust the CC-mode (and
> maybe other?) code that refers to those functions with their old name.

I've grepped all code, and it seems to be only cc-mode.  There, I
changed the code to use the new names.

> Also, I'd prefer to rename the functions so that they all share
> a `subword-' prefix.

In general I agree, but in this case I think fitting to naming of the
word movement functions is more desirable.

I'll try to compile emacs with those changes now, and then I'll commit.

Bye,
Tassilo