From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yavor Doganov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow? Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:05:34 +0200 Organization: The GNU Emacs Church (Bulgarian eparchy) Message-ID: <873a2hc0bl.GNU's_Not_Unix!%yavor@gnu.org> References: <20100103174743.GB1653@muc.de> <87bphbhxxt.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100106131039.GB2447@muc.de> <4B448FF5.5060900@gnu.org> <87hbqze39u.fsf@telefonica.net> <83637fccsz.fsf@gnu.org> <87d41m740k.GNU's_Not_Unix!%yavor@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262884757 24683 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 17:19:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Yavor Doganov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 18:19:10 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSw0q-00087F-Aj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:19:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33984 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSw0q-000173-JY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSvo0-0002yq-K9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:05:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSvnw-0002vA-Ry for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:05:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55106 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSvnw-0002v0-Lg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:05:48 -0500 Original-Received: from b0.f7.net ([66.148.120.132]:48032 helo=f7.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSvnu-0005vQ-49; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:05:46 -0500 X-Envelope-From: yavor@gnu.org Original-Received: from yavor.doganov.org (92_245.btc-net.bg [213.91.245.92] (may be forged)) by f7.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o07H5aZD012002; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:05:40 -0500 Original-Received: from gana.yavor.doganov.org ([192.168.0.5]) by yavor.doganov.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NSvni-0002na-IK; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:05:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=gana.yavor.doganov.org) by gana.yavor.doganov.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NSvni-0003ib-9d; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:05:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Yavor Doganov User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Jabber-ID: doganov@jabber.minus273.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.0.5 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: yavor@gnu.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:09:26 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on yavor.doganov.org) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119596 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Both sftp/http methods get stuck around 275/300 MB, and the > > machine is experiencing sky high loads; I can't even login. > > Hard to believe the load goes high. It's pretty decent (0.5-1.5) in the first 1 hr or so, when the bzr progress indicator is moving. After it becomes (or at least appears to be) stuck, the load goes nuts, increasing from 1.5 to 15 for a few minutes, staying high for a while, falling back again, then up, etc. > But it probably thrashes wildly because Bzr ends up using more than > 500MB. Indeed, it eats the memory + 500 MB swap, but there's still 500 MB swap availaible, so I can't explain myself this behavior. > > I guess if I compress the shared repo and scp it to my home machine, > > it would work, right? > > Yes it would work just fine and be much faster. Yes, it worked nicely, although the download rate at the receiving end was very low. At least I finally have the sources, and can do `bzr pull', etc. Thanks.