From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Getting full bug database dump? Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:04:19 -0500 Message-ID: <873a28k1gc.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <87k4vkltop.fsf@red-bean.com> <201001141731.o0EHVZN1024126@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263492291 23953 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 18:04:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 19:04:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVU3m-0001xM-Bl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55806 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVU3n-0001Ck-7N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:04:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVU3d-00018t-BQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:04:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVU3X-00014V-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:04:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35827 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVU3X-00014R-Gu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.206.141]:41377) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVU3W-0000VQ-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:04:26 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50990 helo=kfogel-work ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NVU3V-0001Ez-Hn; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:04:25 -0600 In-Reply-To: <201001141731.o0EHVZN1024126@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:31:35 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120019 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu writes: >Karl Fogel writes: > > I asked this earlier in another thread, but it should really be a > > separate request: > > > > I'd like to get a full dump of our current debbugs database, to do some > > quantitative analysis that I think might be useful for us. As long as > > it's in some parseable format, I can work with it. > >If you have the time, there's one more thing this would be useful for: >find all the bugs that have patches in them (just search for the diff >headers), and make sure they are tagged with "patch". I may be able to produce that information, along with the other stuff I'm looking at, sure.