From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:28:26 +0100 Message-ID: <873a0p1dqt.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267115334 13355 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2010 16:28:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:28:54 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 17:28:50 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nkga1-0000rz-67 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:28:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nkga0-0007bi-HE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:28:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NkgZt-0007aM-1w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:28:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49568 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkgZs-0007Zf-7w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:28:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkgZs-0003zM-0d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:28:40 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:49309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkgZr-0003zC-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:28:39 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkgZp-0000lJ-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:28:37 +0100 Original-Received: from 83.32.115.245 ([83.32.115.245]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:28:37 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 83.32.115.245 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:28:37 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.32.115.245 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:05jJ7dPIQQ8+SNiFv/YqYMFqhVc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121363 Archived-At: Leo writes: > On 2010-02-25 15:26 +0000, David Reitter wrote: >> The big question is whether this memory leak is acceptable. We have 30 >> MB extra in this case. Even if this is less when compressed, we're >> talking a lot of total storage given some 500 copies of the repository >> (??) and infinitely more bandwidth incurred in the future when >> checking out the repo. (Infinite because Emacs will never die.) > > And if this mistake can happen so easily it will happen again. The most terse way of achieving what he did is bzr add bzr commit -m "tons of things" (from a bound branch, aka checkout) Howevere, the committer didn't detailed what he did to commit all that stuff and this is speculation. Needless to say, one ought to check before committing. In this case, a simple `bzr diff' would do. Or just use VC-dir.