From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs, QT and Cairo Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:32:56 +0200 Message-ID: <8739vmdc87.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <4C3CD120.4040905@swipnet.se> <5A91499A-0470-43FD-9F48-560CEAD3424C@mit.edu> <87zkxuhmfd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279074837 12137 80.91.229.12 (14 Jul 2010 02:33:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:33:57 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 14 04:33:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYrmt-0002gK-JN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:33:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43973 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYrmj-0000Hj-Im for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:33:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46120 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYrmd-0000HH-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYrmc-00087V-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:33:15 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYrmc-00087B-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:33:14 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYrmW-0002d3-Q5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:33:08 +0200 Original-Received: from 83.42.13.171 ([83.42.13.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:33:08 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 83.42.13.171 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:33:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.42.13.171 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/4LyA58syFQls5o4rtwQKTAoQLY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127241 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: [snip] > I regularly get complaints from people about redisplay over the > network. The problem as usual is not bandwidth (what is measured by > "14.4k"), but latency. It's the number of roundtrips that matters, > and modern WANs often have greater average latency than a modem line. Using NX improves things a lot. I find it usable over 50 Kbps Internet connections, with a ping of ~100 ms. [snip]