From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
Cc: Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: substitute-key-definition vs. define-key MAP [remap ...]
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:43:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8739v7u160.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ocdvx3r3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:19:44 +0900")
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org> writes:
> > It's far better, because it follows the normal scoping rules of
> > keymaps
>
> OK, but that's not what I understood from Stefan's description. He
> said that remapping would affect *all* uses of the command as a
> binding, requiring either invocation via M-x or renaming the command.
It affects all uses _where the [remap ...] key-entry is visible (in the
same way a normal binding is visible)_.
So in my example, when caps-lock-mode is turned on, a small [remap]
binding becomes visible via minor-mode-map-alist, and thus affects
keystrokes in that buffer (until you turn off the minor-mode, which
implicitly disables its keymap).
[I have no idea what the implementation is like, but the above is the
basic idea.]
-Miles
--
We are all lying in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
-Oscar Wilde
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-25 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-15 8:25 substitute-key-definition vs. define-key MAP [remap ...] Teemu Likonen
2010-07-22 22:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-07-23 3:50 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-07-23 9:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-07-23 9:32 ` Miles Bader
2010-07-24 7:08 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-07-24 8:19 ` David Kastrup
2010-07-24 9:33 ` Miles Bader
2010-07-24 14:25 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-07-25 3:21 ` Miles Bader
2010-07-25 10:19 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-07-25 13:43 ` Miles Bader [this message]
2010-07-23 10:03 ` David Kastrup
2010-07-24 6:27 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8739v7u160.fsf@catnip.gol.com \
--to=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
--cc=stephen@xemacs.org \
--cc=tlikonen@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.