From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Compiled files without sources???? Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:25:22 +0200 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <8739hn3np9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <877hc7lzcc.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8762rq7w7h.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871v2en9n1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871v2eyece.fsf_-_@engster.org> <87r5ad91dm.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es> <87zkp1solk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wrk54pzp.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es> <87tyf7aw9b.fsf@engster.org> <871uxgyu0u.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87vcus3slm.fsf@engster.org> <87k4b4jv8p.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877h7444uj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tya82mv5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pqktdpf6.fsf@tochka.ru> <87y5zggc5d.fsf@tochka.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312032346 22996 80.91.229.12 (30 Jul 2011 13:25:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:25:46 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 30 15:25:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn9Xy-00071r-3r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:25:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37042 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn9Xx-0008Lx-LI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:25:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn9Xv-0008Lr-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:25:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn9Xt-0006Xb-PS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:25:39 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:45067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn9Xt-0006XP-Dr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:25:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn9Xr-0006xn-I1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:25:35 +0200 Original-Received: from p508ed3f4.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.142.211.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:25:35 +0200 Original-Received: from dak by p508ed3f4.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:25:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p508ed3f4.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xqpWn1oO1fYbVHWWyxuvsqrQfQw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142519 Archived-At: "Evgeny M. Zubok" writes: > Richard Stallman writes: > >> There are multiple archives called "ELPA" and I am not sure which one >> you mean. If it is the GNU one, we definitely must add the >> documentation source. If it is another, we cannot tell those people >> what to do with code that isn't copyright FSF. But we won't refer the >> users to any archive that fails to follow thus rule. > > Yes, I meant the GNU ELPA and the packages `muse' and `auctex'. I am somewhat surprised since the upstream AUCTeX source includes an XEmacs package in the Makefile that does come with the documentation sources. Their package format has been designed with one goal being not to have the GPL compliance police breathe down the XEmacs developers' necks, so it would seem fair that we ourselves try to meet the standards others can reasonably expect to be subjected to by us. -- David Kastrup