From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10625: 23.3; message does not close new message fraom opened from rmail Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:01:15 +0800 Message-ID: <8739b0lh5g.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327716152 25121 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2012 02:02:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10625@debbugs.gnu.org, "David J. Biesack" , Richard Stallman To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 28 03:02:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqxcY-0008Ru-Hn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:02:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55487 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqxcX-00060d-Vo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:02:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqxcV-00060T-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:02:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqxcU-0007AY-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:02:23 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqxcU-0007AU-79 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:02:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqxd8-0004e1-94 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10625 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10625-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10625.132771613917752 (code B ref 10625); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10625) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2012 02:02:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47167 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqxcR-0004cF-1S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:02:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36272 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqxcO-0004c5-Ma for 10625@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:02:17 -0500 Original-Received: from bb121-7-229-168.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.168]:38481 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqxbc-0003Jd-9L; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:01:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:44:15 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56100 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Thanks for the report. This was supposedly already fixed for the coming > Emacs 24.1 release by the following changes: > > 2011-01-13 Chong Yidong > [...] > * mail/rmail.el (rmail-mail-return): New function. > (rmail-start-mail): Pass it to compose-mail. > > However, I belive it was then broken again by these changes: > > 2011-06-23 Richard Stallman > > * mail/rmail.el [...] > (rmail-start-mail): Don't specify use of rmail-mail-return; > that's done by mail-bury now. > > This neglects other mail user agents. I fixed this by putting the send-action argument back (this still works with the changed mail-bury).