From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10751: 24.0.93; BCC in Gnus isn't working Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:52:23 +0100 Message-ID: <8739amtlh4.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87fwemnbft.fsf@escher.home> <87sjimtmsd.fsf@gnus.org> <8762fiml3j.fsf@escher.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328647991 17812 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2012 20:53:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10751@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Stephen Berman" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 21:53:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rus2I-0006uB-Jv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:53:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52121 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rus2I-0003CQ-67 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:53:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rus2E-0003CJ-NS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rus2D-0001HB-9f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:53:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rus2D-0001H7-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rus38-0007gt-EQ; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10751 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10751-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10751.132864801529518 (code B ref 10751); Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10751) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2012 20:53:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rus2h-0007g0-FC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:53:35 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:51176) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rus2e-0007fo-PF for 10751@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:53:34 -0500 Original-Received: from 93-41-188-50.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.188.50] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rus1Z-0004OA-3h; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8762fiml3j.fsf@escher.home> (Stephen Berman's message of "7 Feb 2012 21:42:24 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1Rus1Z-0004OA-3h MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1329252745.57006@mXHDeUhQmPf8rHdaBbeZNg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56669 Archived-At: "Stephen Berman" writes: > ... Yes, it's exactly as in my OP. So it's not a Gnus but a Message > mode bug. I've just tried this (emacs -Q, `C-x m', added a Bcc header), and the message seems to have been sent to both the To and the Bcc addresses. So I'm not able to reproduce this bug. This is with the current Emacs 24 trunk, but I don't think there's been any changes in this dept since 24.0.93. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome