From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen Berman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is the 2012-04-01 Update to Org version 7.8.07 incomplete? Date: 7 May 2012 09:52:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87397c77iz.fsf@escher.home> References: <874nscri2d.fsf@escher.home> <871ungdfq4.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87zka4q2ek.fsf@escher.home> <87ipgswuo2.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwbelumk.fsf@escher.home> <8762caslj9.fsf@altern.org> <8762cal9t2.fsf@escher.home> <87zk9mjkwe.fsf@gnu.org> <878vh4wnjz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336377152 9152 80.91.229.3 (7 May 2012 07:52:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 07:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bastien , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Chong Yidong" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 07 09:52:30 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SRIk3-0000K1-A8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 09:52:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38458 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRIk2-0000Fo-Et for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 03:52:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRIjv-0000D7-JJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 03:52:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRIjo-0004Hj-Mr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 03:52:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mi.ruhr-uni-bochum.de ([134.147.64.53]:52093 helo=mx4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRIjo-0004H3-DN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 03:52:08 -0400 X-Queued: (qmail 28132 invoked by alias); 7 May 2012 07:52:06 -0000 X-Queued: (qmail 28119 invoked from network); 7 May 2012 07:52:05 -0000 Original-Received: from c2-3-4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (134.147.64.5) by mx4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with SMTP; 7 May 2012 07:52:05 -0000 X-Queued: (qmail 5826 invoked by uid 281); 7 May 2012 07:52:05 -0000 X-Qmailscanner: from 89.245.71.144 (Pj9yBs7kPuQs3T49dErfhw==@89.245.71.144) by c2-3-4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (envelope-from , uid 80) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (sophie: 3.05/3.29/4.75. Clear:RC:1(89.245.71.144):. Processed in 0.020392 secs); 07 May 2012 07:52:05 -0000 Original-Received: from i59f54790.versanet.de (HELO escher.home) (Pj9yBs7kPuQs3T49dErfhw==@89.245.71.144) by c2-3-4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 7 May 2012 07:52:05 -0000 In-Reply-To: <878vh4wnjz.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 07 May 2012 13:46:40 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 134.147.64.53 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150338 Archived-At: On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:46:40 +0800 Chong Yidong wrote: > Bastien writes: > >> Okay. This is now both in the maint branch and the master branch of >> the git repository of Org-mode. The maint branch will be merged into >> Emacs before the next Emacs pretest -- which AFAIK is not planned yet. > > There may not be a next pretest, only the release candidate. In any > case, this late in the pretest process I'm not sure another big merge > from Org upstream is appropriate. > > If there is a critical bug that needs to be fixed, cherry-pick it into > the emacs-24 branch. Other fixes should go into the trunk. This bug isn't critical, just (to me) annoying, and it's fine for me to install it in the trunk, since that's what I regularly build from. Steve Berman