From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aidan Gauland Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eshell and Sudo Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:47:18 +1300 Message-ID: <8738wulqvd.fsf@dimension8.tehua.net> References: <87ehgg451n.fsf@gnu.org> <87txpc3wnn.fsf@gmx.de> <87wqu6u91q.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361126864 21431 80.91.229.3 (17 Feb 2013 18:47:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:47:44 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 17 19:48:06 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U79HR-0004r9-KE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:48:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36787 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U79H7-000475-Q9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:47:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59979) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U79H3-000466-7O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:47:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U79H2-0005mW-5j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U79H1-0005m4-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:47:40 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U79HI-0004nG-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:47:56 +0100 Original-Received: from 114-134-6-163.rurallink.co.nz ([114.134.6.163]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:47:56 +0100 Original-Received: from aidalgol by 114-134-6-163.rurallink.co.nz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:47:56 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 114-134-6-163.rurallink.co.nz User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BBeEspS8OmzR1BilxQfGqK8Kf8o= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157106 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > Both patches are pretty simple. I would like to install them in the > emacs-24 branch. Objections? Thanks for coming to the rescue. The changes look fine, except for the `require' in a defun. Is that a good idea? (Not a rhetorical question; I don't know, I just haven't seen this before.) Regards, Aidan Gauland