From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thierry Volpiatto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:15:29 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Message-ID: <8738wksw32.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj4m8auj.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361776597 19714 80.91.229.3 (25 Feb 2013 07:16:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:16:37 +0000 (UTC) To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 25 08:17:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sJ2-0002dV-1V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:17:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60698 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sIh-0006OF-4W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:16:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54541) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sId-0006O7-FR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:16:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sIb-0006gi-Vj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:16:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.43] (port=43295 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sIb-0006fh-TH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:16:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sK2-0007Kf-D8; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136177665028138 (code B ref -1); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2013 07:17:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sJV-0007Jn-Vq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:17:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42901) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sJU-0007Jg-8Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:17:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sHt-0006XX-6l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:15:50 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:42040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sHt-0006XP-3g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:15:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sHq-0006LQ-VB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:15:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sHo-0006WQ-Ps for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:15:46 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sHo-0006Vz-JI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:15:44 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sI4-0001tb-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:16:00 +0100 Original-Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:16:00 +0100 Original-Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:16:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 66 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:N//zaeDIfe3UPUEt2UC438+cXtY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71769 Archived-At: Hi Katsumi, Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >> Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >>> Ok, I'll surely try it. > > I tried the last patch. > > [...] >> ,----[ Replying on github ] >>| A "reply-to" header exists: >>| >>| From: Le Wang >>| Reply-To: emacs-helm/helm >>| >>| To: emacs-helm/helm >>| >>| I send a reply with my patch applied: >>| >>| From: Thierry Volpiatto >>| To: emacs-helm/helm >>| >>| Cc: emacs-helm/helm > > Why this /wide reply/ doesn't go to "Le Wang"? Because it is an invalid address, everybody when replying will get the same address, e.g if you reply to github your address will be "Katsumi Yamaoka ", it is why github provide a reply-to header and internally, github will send to the real address of Le Wang. > Even if Le Wang is a subscriber, a regular visitor, or a staff of the > Emacs Helm list, don't we usually include the author of an original > mail in the recipients list if it is a wide reply? Yes unless a "reply-to" header is provided, which is the case here. > Otherwise if Le Wang's address is invalid and you want Gnus to exclude > it from the recipients list, you can use the user option > `message-dont-reply-to-names'. This is an option yes, but I think that when a "reply-to" header is provided, it should take precedence on the "to" header actually provided, isn't it the purpose of the "reply-to" header ? >>| I send a reply with actual code (bug) >>| >>| From: Thierry Volpiatto >>| To: Le Wang >>| Cc: emacs-helm/helm , emacs-helm/helm >>| >> `---- > > Is it ok that both the cases contain ? > You can omit it as well using `message-dont-reply-to-names' (if > you want). This one should not be omitted IMO. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997