From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Bad indentation with visual-line-mode Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:06:23 +0100 Message-ID: <8738whpg2o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87621ertu9.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> <87a9qqeybo.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3ptkb77.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50069) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAp9O-0000Wa-Ok for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:07:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAp9A-0002qi-GT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:06:53 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:63740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAp99-0002lm-76 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:06:44 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id es5so920615wgb.29 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:06:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k3ptkb77.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> (Torsten Bronger's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:50:36 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Torsten, Torsten Bronger writes: > But my point is that I don't want to > have indentation of the subtrees, only of the list items. This > basically means that org-indent-mode isn't the solution I am looking > for. Mhh.. Indeed. > Besides, setting org-indent-indentation-per-level to "0" > triggers this error on startup: > > Warning (initialization): An error occurred while loading `/home/bronger/.emacs': > > Args out of range: [nil * ** *** **** ***** ****** ******* ******** > ********* ********** *********** ************ ************* ************** > *************** **************** ***************** ****************** > ******************* ******************** nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil > nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil], -1 > > Should I report a bug? Fixed, thanks! > And, shouldn't visual-line-mode's behaviour that it doesn't respect > the indentation of org-mode be considerd a bug, too? I don't think so, I believe this is an inherent limitation of visual-line-mode. The basic meaning of "indentation" is "indentation at the true beginning of a line", not "indentation at the visual left margin", so I doubt anyone can claim that the visual "indentation" you see with `visual-line-mode' should be displayed like the real indentation you have without out. HTH, -- Bastien