From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"? Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:25:48 +0100 Message-ID: <8738j0ihjn.fsf@igel.home> References: <20140301171337.53CC638073E@snark.thyrsus.com> <8338j1vkta.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvn17gbc.fsf@slice.rozzin.com> <83ppm5tfsg.fsf@gnu.org> <87ob1pywn7.fsf@slice.rozzin.com> <83k3ccts3p.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393784762 10699 80.91.229.3 (2 Mar 2014 18:26:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 18:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Joshua Judson Rosen To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 02 19:26:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WKB5V-0005Jw-FZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:26:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36299 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKB5U-0004mh-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39785) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKB5N-0004gy-5H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:26:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKB5I-0006R5-DI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:26:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:46503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKB5D-0006QU-4m; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:25:51 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3fcXws6trDz4KK3w; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:25:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3fcXws3sdDzbbgH; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:25:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ohK4-toMKCyF; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:25:48 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: JRgYEDpBMwhhDaOoNCsVbAduBoiL3GMwn8Zj4qxds7U= Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-229-25.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.229.25]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:25:48 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8B8112C3498; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:25:48 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: This PIZZA symbolizes my COMPLETE EMOTIONAL RECOVERY!! In-Reply-To: <83k3ccts3p.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:42:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170059 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Joshua Judson Rosen >> Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 00:53:00 -0500 >> >> > > > > revno: 111954.1.4 >> > > > > committer: K. Handa >> > > > > branch nick: work >> > > > > timestamp: Fri 2013-03-22 00:18:44 +0900 >> > > > > message: >> > > > > Fix a bug introduced by revno:111954.1.97 >> > > > > >> > > > > It doesn't show up in a bzr log --levels=0 listing, and the fact that >> > > > > 97 > 4 suggests the reference is garbled. >> > > > >> > > > I think the correct reference is 111964.1.6. It was merged in >> > > > r112051. >> > > >> > > ... and the "revno:111954.1.97" was a reference to trunk revno:112051. >> > >> > No, it isn't, IMO: they have different parents. >> >> They actually don't have different parents--they have the same revid, >> and really _are_ the same revision-object. > > No, they haven't, and no, they aren't: > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > revno: 111964.1.6 revno:111954.1.97 refers to revno:112051, not revno:111964.1.6. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."