Re: de-dynamicizing some code

[Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> I assume the proper solution is to replace this:
>>      (funcall formatfun record)
>> with:
>>      (funcall formatfun record indent fmt)
>> Is that correct?
>
> There are various solutions, but this one looks like a very good
> option, indeed.
>
> The next best thing is to rename the variables to bbdb-fmt and
> bbdb-indent (and to add "(defvar bbdb-indent) (defvar bbdb-fmt)"
> somewhere at top-level (to tell the compiler that these vars should use
> dynamic binding).

Interesting -- thanks. I guess in this case the simpler solution is
enough.

E