From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22527: 25.0.90; Updating packages seems to be broken Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:51:47 -0400 Message-ID: <8737s7wd9o.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k2mo6pez.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457034742 16737 80.91.229.3 (3 Mar 2016 19:52:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:52:22 +0000 (UTC) To: 22527@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 20:52:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1abZIB-0003Nu-Ad for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 20:52:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37062 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abZIA-0004oU-P0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:52:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33831) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abZI6-0004nA-FQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:52:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abZI2-0003Kz-F8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:52:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abZI2-0003Kb-AM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abZI2-0000IZ-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22527 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22527-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22527.14570347181136 (code B ref 22527); Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22527) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2016 19:51:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60473 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abZHy-0000IG-0h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:51:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com ([209.85.213.182]:37504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abZHv-0000I1-SH for 22527@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:51:56 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z8so2725307ige.0 for <22527@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:51:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F4JUiqWVvJSHnSRXfKLI1btYg17Yl2uuiqD7oAqScH4=; b=Zgi0adpNOJq/gmImk87EfEs7OpgfijiAu/vD6hnsG0ZYAnzXxdVlzjKFuO78yHF1z9 kZb2dmlv95DO865fKrPT9ztYxsks7f/cAaYIro22bFDu55n5agG6z75u4vjgoVB60kuL G8hTTqE5tpUnvAdYvN4a96LPsksc0En9eR4plZuCLWf2CTf5EVZNTnAjld+8xDHfqMpJ Gbj3OYtlqPFLxqVJ+fu2v+vgk9IEr21RLPyu6fZ5j/9/KlF/+XiQm1BzA/gEhnWXcg7D wib6U+MasQnn9gMqRTUkHjMwugsj5bJhyfT3tK59rY3OuT0dgmQPbJc0LCyJK8kA+gFF mBIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F4JUiqWVvJSHnSRXfKLI1btYg17Yl2uuiqD7oAqScH4=; b=InaxFZoYtyq824SB4o3xgRCxjqC1yR/AYk4ILji+BEl0peZZUVV3HbfsRCfOIikyC+ /bF27vDI5+yzo+19QwYxDNjHngblb/BwW+3dZuMw7sbsxXYGY+Kf7rpX622WtWnnl9/4 9lFgKsRGXSWmxEt3N8WWA4VxRQ4g2RQx1ch94SzlwTLv62hNdb/PmfDep0H6cKiIyx5q Rehrz3mumFedG2AyCoEsFzPOt1XtXvOjFeh4ECiqiRHGHz/m62vejyDNpQVasDg8Zf1V MNdXaUGmeEFNbiqLPqGjBtF6BOyfWzfqxzKM1FH1KRhChw8q6M9l6mRC5oJdp8/XB9kj 8D1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJEr8VqCXR7P9qzYiCMGsUQw23KinLikRRX7HwfkpN3YLYBI3PGhONAR1BqHvoVEw== X-Received: by 10.50.147.67 with SMTP id ti3mr901072igb.48.1457034710188; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:51:50 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from moondust.nodomain.none ([142.227.16.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i187sm46927ioi.33.2016.03.03.11.51.48 for <22527@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:51:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k2mo6pez.fsf@gmail.com> (N. Jackson's message of "Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:23:16 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:114359 Archived-At: At 18:23 -0400 on Monday 2016-02-01, N. Jackson wrote: > > For several years, for my system at least, package update has been as > simple as: > > M-x list-packages RET > U ; (package-menu-mark-upgrades) > x ; (package-menu-execute) > > This no longer seems to work. Instead, I get the message: > > Unsigned file =E2=80=98org-20160201.tar=E2=80=99 at http://elpa.gnu.o= rg/packages/ This is possibly related to http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D= 22440. With the new pretest (25.0.92) this problem seems to be fixed. Whether that means that #22440 is now fixed, or that org is now signed or something else, I don't know. > I tried removing the install mark (the `I' in the left margin) for > org to see if I could get my other packages to update at least, but this > leads to the message: > > Delete package =E2=80=98org-20151123=E2=80=99; and Upgrade these 2 pa= ckages (auctex-11.89.1, debbugs-0.9)? (y or n) > > This message makes no sense: I don't want to delete org just because I > can't update it. Naturally I answered `n' to the prompt. But now things > are stuck in a limbo where I can't update any packages. This part of my bug report was pilot error. It seems that there has been a change in behaviour? When package-menu-mark-upgrades marks a package for upgrade, it now also marks the old version of the package for deletion. This explains the above message that surprised me. I don't think it did this before? IIRC, formerly it prompted to delete the old version after the new version was successfully installed. If this is a new change in behaviour in Emacs 25, I suppose it should be in NEWS?