From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ingo Lohmar Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: handling of completion table duplicates Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 19:28:37 +0200 Message-ID: <8737qy7ika.fsf@acer.localhost.com> References: <87h9fiewnf.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <87inzyzrpa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <0782d65f-084b-4aba-9813-83aa9a78e81b@default> <8760vvre99.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <06c2916e-6ff3-4c93-ae63-e50776de8085@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459963728 19466 80.91.229.3 (6 Apr 2016 17:28:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 19:28:47 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1anrG3-0008SS-EO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 19:28:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44655 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anrG3-0002Nb-05 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:28:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anrFz-0002NJ-OH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:28:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anrFv-0006Qu-Of for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:28:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]:36057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anrFv-0006Qn-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:28:39 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id o129so5709785wmo.3 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:28:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=BtMHVnqT9bGT+wplxCeJWSMD7aXIuiUUkYqTaswlTfs=; b=cR+MXPBqpUGoJNhzfWL44U8CjFLtUuTth6lnBH+/NR/gHpXKsmawXvLn7lrF1Sp/J0 JuHMEDAqgTq23R99Q+N++/RW+N/+qqQZ5IJPkpN21rdEmUje8BKIdU7N2Wehtcrfes8S uk2u9SdZw51nTl+mQVbIAv498RGjXSU6Blms4jxwGcmea/XVBRE3DtQCzjkOFKfB4xdh n8vdolEAMdZMws6GRCiffTsOmkv2wYxuqs5Oc4/fPPIylT1m91E/LxjehG32sJruby0m Kd4QBdLx4V5Xieu0snF2sFGpkO8DYkvWaRGrECuLTIbfmOQakasjM0ybx6UXLb/m50ok ylsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=BtMHVnqT9bGT+wplxCeJWSMD7aXIuiUUkYqTaswlTfs=; b=UUMannW2KxrJymjfDEmYAf4o2kZQgij9vrVdwQUqpNwEhzseyrfYcBwEP1vfulUMQ8 8nb8okmFt+MYSMc/WPQNUAfFKJ78yvf0I4ASSRPJ0PSpfwJ3z4xOplPQfQtOBG2DtDpn NjBmapW0kpqQcJMcWbakZF2SOwSi9mOjbBTnG1gc5MjDnnmd0SXzkzXbXAUDUjgQPMVl ehOg+BDUvpdfWSMa0jPeNWFOADyXMaOcLOrY/CATe9prilVhYpH9HdBZBIKRmTAtXPea rQU3cOuJpf23gu+VBZQK2KC4uhu0G0R4EuCMuiW5ZJZf2KmbhEnP2ViS5zbQN7VyvPDP c61w== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIw8JMffPH0IVNv2bs1IMWUfXr8gBOm1ETq7aJ5w3kCaYjDPnc8D1Hx2CLqxD9l3w== X-Received: by 10.28.23.70 with SMTP id 67mr24982318wmx.70.1459963718894; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (xdsl-87-78-53-189.netcologne.de. [87.78.53.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w75sm26012799wmd.10.2016.04.06.10.28.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:28:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <06c2916e-6ff3-4c93-ae63-e50776de8085@default> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+113~g6332e6e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.90.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::244 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202770 Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 05 2016 14:42 (-0700), Drew Adams wrote: >> So I take it that the absence of any documentation on duplicate removal >> is intentional (or at least it's no oversight) --- the question would >> rather be "why should (or how even could) the handler remove them?" > > Not sure whom you're asking or quite what you are asking. > What do you mean by "the handler"? And are you talking about > vanilla Emacs? If so, it already removes duplicates. I just summarized what I gather from this short thread. By "the handler" I was referring to completing-read-default et al, who have to handle a collection for completion.