From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert Krewinkel Subject: Re: Question on nested-blocks syntax Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:27:07 +0200 Message-ID: <8737pv8osk.fsf@espresso.zeitkraut.de> References: <87bn4j8rvz.fsf@espresso.zeitkraut.de> <87inyrijq0.fsf@saiph.selenimh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41987) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aycyw-0004RP-A3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 06:27:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aycyk-0007pL-Ii for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 06:27:32 -0400 Received: from reynholm.zeitkraut.de ([89.238.65.123]:38649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aycyj-0007n1-91 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 06:27:26 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by reynholm.zeitkraut.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8276D5EA0151 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:28:18 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87inyrijq0.fsf@saiph.selenimh> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 06 May 2016 12:06:31 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Albert Krewinkel writes: > >> Is there any chance that indentation-based nesting will become legit >> org-mode syntax? > > I don't think so. It would introduce unnecessary complexity. I guess that makes sense. Too bad, though. Thanks for the quick reply, -- Albert Krewinkel GPG: 8eed e3e2 e8c5 6f18 81fe e836 388d c0b2 1f63 1124