From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25025: python-shell-calculate-command is wrong Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:36:15 -0500 Message-ID: <8737i9iz28.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <83polk3qow.fsf@gnu.org> <83inra13r3.fsf@gnu.org> <8337ic29y0.fsf@gnu.org> <87r35wj4b8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83zikkzytf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480466178 5258 195.159.176.226 (30 Nov 2016 00:36:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:36:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25025@debbugs.gnu.org, clement.pit@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 01:36:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cBssc-0008Fd-Bh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 01:36:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBsse-0005E9-4x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:36:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBssX-0005Dp-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBssU-0007GQ-Dp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:36:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBssU-0007GK-9r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cBssU-0006Rr-22 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25025 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 25025-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25025.148046612624746 (code B ref 25025); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25025) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2016 00:35:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46644 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cBsrt-0006R3-VI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:35:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:35862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cBsrs-0006Qq-Nw for 25025@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:35:25 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m5so183952170ioe.3 for <25025@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:35:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=H5dq2efqH86Fk36OcFtK1v6WoqZm12i0Vg9ce7qvay0=; b=AEw+hhulus2ux4fhkdSOE33I5RHsRZr9qpoRoCygGOpFmm39xwDDUuQ5nDnd4Ai9si WbekbcAWACHjnWW+5gEHV3N6H38d7Wwc68ZLQKOMVk17MZiDpaUxIKyg8SyMa/0DgFdH 237t4aOK2f+WZTUZ6Wh6qDIlDgMkcpvKhcWoqU10XwrcqXJgap+lWmpXW2Xe3im24ogW SxTML2rhBtcltcd20rPUHTRhBSieP6DAojw2hMhil8oK0LmzQ/HBtWyypYCmPk69clO2 6KtVTqzvSclTz+Hnxxfnq6iehRAFna0+ucjVMQtaNY7DqydmCPFILKVpLhXA1WYUbugP aUxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=H5dq2efqH86Fk36OcFtK1v6WoqZm12i0Vg9ce7qvay0=; b=R2XkwMpZ12veigKqtfCzW5eOb5yy0Qpk4wrWQfMaMaBBGqxAFJ6TSRazLErcuIJpmv 8d9zCKYyv4LY7dFPh28ffjMjneIvkI++vXr983R8ZPAGKcao6WFqpt2vw3JDAcjwD9xT OtShGhGQ5iF/W5HIqH/S6rqni9cN5cI7aCQUoyrKDKk47GxBiL19APgUHoQAudLlSoxM rm7mu608PBQLd1vqOWy+h+BSMatzJyv6V45UGUiIPHZ7+0NDbd2zfm0kuPpYAnFNXr1D u2IT6LnO/RPcK84dgO/r165gI3J0xdSPyZ7Ff3H8bs71HA3MBaqmINznplbIwmlTt8eY QWhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03SPKbhXWnlIUCc0I8TQSB3eEUVM27evo5KcFnNjbWETwSV96qA/DyXCyeRf+ILqQ== X-Received: by 10.36.107.151 with SMTP id v145mr26383758itc.17.1480466118836; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:35:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v75sm1755020ita.12.2016.11.29.16.35.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:35:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83zikkzytf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 27 Nov 2016 18:12:44 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126279 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net >> Cc: 25025@debbugs.gnu.org, clement.pit@gmail.com >> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 11:06:03 -0500 >> >> > Why does it need to be split? A shell command can (even should) be >> > handed to the shell as a single string. >> >> Currently it's not a shell command, because a shell isn't being used. >> My other suggestion was to use a shell: >> >> >> It might be more intuitive to actually use a shell and then the user >> >> would enter a shell command (though inserting a shell into things >> >> might bring more complications). > > If it doesn't use a shell, then it has no business quoting commands or > their parts using shell-related APIs. > > So yes, I think using a shell would be TRT here. Can someone please > work on a patch in that direction? This problem exists for a long > time, so I hope we could solve it soon. Hmm, the difficulty in using a shell is that the current code wants to parse the command into interpreter and arguments in order to match against `python-shell-completion-native-disabled-interpreters'.